ECONOMIC BURDEN OF INPATIENT POST-ADMISSION DEHYDRATION – RETROSPECTIVE DATABASE ANALYSIS IN US

Author(s)

Pash E*;Hashemi L, Parikh N Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare costs and resource utilization of patients experiencing post-admission dehydration (PAD) to those who do not experience PAD. METHODS: All adult inpatient discharges excluding those with suspected dehydration present on admission (ICD-9-CM codes for dehydration: 276.0, 276.1, 276.5X present on admission) were identified from the Premier database(CY2011). Patients with missing information on important variables were excluded. PAD patients were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. PAD and no PAD(NPAD) groups were matched on propensity score adjusting for demographics (age, gender, race, medical, elective patients), patient severity (APR-DRG severity scores) and hospital characteristics (geographic location, bed-size, teaching and urban hospital). Costs (total and departmental), days of stay in hospital(LOS), incidence of mortality and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection(CAUTI) were compared between groups using t-test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variable. Sub-groups of medical and surgical population were also matched and analyzed separately. RESULTS: Total of 86,398(2.1%) of all the selected patients experienced PAD. Post-matching mean total cost were significantly higher for the PAD group compared to NPAD group($33,945 vs. $22,380, p<0.0001). Mean costs associated with room & board, central supply, surgery, pharmacy and other miscellaneous departments were also significantly higher for PAD group(all p<0.0001). Compared to NPAD group, PAD group had higher mean LOS days(12.9 vs. 8.2) and also had a higher incidence of CAUTI(0.6 vs. 0.5%) and in-hospital mortality(8.6% vs. 7.8%) (all p<0.05). The results for sub-group analysis were also significant for total costs(Medical patients: $22,065 vs. 15,700; Surgical patients: $45,728 vs. $32,091) and LOS days(Medical patients: 11.4 vs. 8.3; Surgical patients: 17.8 vs. 11.4) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PAD has a potential to add significant burden to hospital costs and resources. Adopting strategies aimed at avoiding PAD may help in reducing hospital cost and resource burden and may improve patient outcomes.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-09, ISPOR Latin America 2013, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)

Code

PHP24

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×