ECONOMIC BURDEN OF INPATIENT POST-ADMISSION DEHYDRATION – RETROSPECTIVE DATABASE ANALYSIS IN US
Author(s)
Pash E*;Hashemi L, Parikh N Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare costs and resource utilization of patients experiencing post-admission dehydration (PAD) to those who do not experience PAD. METHODS: All adult inpatient discharges excluding those with suspected dehydration present on admission (ICD-9-CM codes for dehydration: 276.0, 276.1, 276.5X present on admission) were identified from the Premier database(CY2011). Patients with missing information on important variables were excluded. PAD patients were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. PAD and no PAD(NPAD) groups were matched on propensity score adjusting for demographics (age, gender, race, medical, elective patients), patient severity (APR-DRG severity scores) and hospital characteristics (geographic location, bed-size, teaching and urban hospital). Costs (total and departmental), days of stay in hospital(LOS), incidence of mortality and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection(CAUTI) were compared between groups using t-test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variable. Sub-groups of medical and surgical population were also matched and analyzed separately. RESULTS: Total of 86,398(2.1%) of all the selected patients experienced PAD. Post-matching mean total cost were significantly higher for the PAD group compared to NPAD group($33,945 vs. $22,380, p<0.0001). Mean costs associated with room & board, central supply, surgery, pharmacy and other miscellaneous departments were also significantly higher for PAD group(all p<0.0001). Compared to NPAD group, PAD group had higher mean LOS days(12.9 vs. 8.2) and also had a higher incidence of CAUTI(0.6 vs. 0.5%) and in-hospital mortality(8.6% vs. 7.8%) (all p<0.05). The results for sub-group analysis were also significant for total costs(Medical patients: $22,065 vs. 15,700; Surgical patients: $45,728 vs. $32,091) and LOS days(Medical patients: 11.4 vs. 8.3; Surgical patients: 17.8 vs. 11.4) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PAD has a potential to add significant burden to hospital costs and resources. Adopting strategies aimed at avoiding PAD may help in reducing hospital cost and resource burden and may improve patient outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-09, ISPOR Latin America 2013, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 7 (November 2013)
Code
PHP24
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Multiple Diseases