PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN SATISFACTION WITH RISPERIDONE LONG-ACTING INJECTION- INTERIM RESULTS FROM THE ELECTRONIC SCHIZOPHRENIA TREATMENT ADHERENCE REGISTRY (E-STAR) IN KOREA
Author(s)
Min Soo Lee, MD, Psychiatrist1, Yong Sik Kim, MD, Psychiatrist2, Dong Geun Lee, MD, Psychiatrist3, In Ho Paik, MD, Psychiatrist4, Hae Kook Lee, MD, Psychiatrist4, In Kwa Jung, MD, Psychiatrist1, Jung Goo Lee, MD, Psychiatrist5, Tae Min Hah, MD, Psychiatrist6, Zhongyun Zhao, PhD, Director71Korea University, Seoul, South Korea; 2 Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea; 3 Goyang Mental Hospital, Goyang, South Korea; 4 The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea; 5 Masan Dongsuh Hospital, Masan, South Korea; 6 Busan Dongrae Hospital, Busan, South Korea; 7 JJPS, Raritan, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) in patients enrolled in the electronic Schizophrenia Treatment Adherence Registry (e-STAR) in Korea.METHODS: e-STAR is an ongoing, international, long-term, prospective, observational study of schizophrenia patients who start RLAI during their routine clinical management. Data are collected for 1-year retrospectively and at 3-monthly intervals for 2-years prospectively. Both patient and physician satisfaction with treatment is assessed on a 5-point scale from ‘very good’ to ‘very bad’ at baseline and every visit thereafter.RESULTS: To date, 162 patients enrolled in e-STAR from Korea and 127 were followed for 6-month; of which 107 with baseline and at least one follow-up for treatment satisfaction assessment were included in this interim analysis. Mean age was 36.8±11.4 years, 49.5% were male and mean time since diagnosis was 8.4±7.1 years. Mean dose of RLAI was 28.0 mg at baseline and 32.8 mg at 6-months. At 6-months, 82.2% (88/107) still continued on RLAI. For all 107 patients, 37.4% of patients expressed “good” or “very good” satisfaction while 22.4% of them expressed “bad” or “very bad” with their previous treatment at baseline. Similarly, 46.8% of physicians reported “good” or “very good” of satisfaction and 17.7% rated their satisfaction as “bad” or “very bad” at baseline. After initiating RLAI, both patient and physician satisfaction with treatment improved. At 6-months after start of RLAI, 71.1% of patients were highly satisfied (‘good’ or ‘very good’) with this treatment and 7.5% felt ‘bad’ or ‘very bad’. Physicians also expressed high satisfaction with RLAI with 77.6% reporting ‘good’ or ‘very good’ and 1.9% reported below ‘moderate’.CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis indicates that after RLAI treatment, both patient and physician satisfaction with the treatment substantially improved. High satisfaction might lead to better adherence and thus better long-term treatment outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2008-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2008, Seoul, South Korea
Value in Health, Vol. 11, No. 6 (November 2008)
Code
MH1
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction
Disease
Mental Health
Explore Related HEOR by Topic