HEALTHCARE UTILIZATION AND COSTS AMONG POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN ON ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY

Author(s)

Nduaguba SO1, Chimah C1, Barner JC2, Schnur K1
1The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: Although aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been shown to be more effective than tamoxifen (TMX) in delaying disease progression, reducing risk of recurrence, and improving survival among post-menopausal women with a history of breast cancer, both classes of drugs are recommended options for adjuvant endocrine therapy. We aimed to compare healthcare utilization and expenditures between the two drug classes. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized 2010-2014 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and included women aged ≥55 years with a history of breast cancer who were treated with an AI or TMX within the past 5 years. Health care utilization and annual expenditures were compared between cohorts using linear and log-transformed regression. RESULTS: The cohorts contributed 221 patient-years (Weighted N = 2,610,777) with 182 (Weighted N=2,099,698) for AIs and 39 (Weighted N = 511,079) for TMX. In the unadjusted analysis, there was no statistical difference between both groups in overall annual expenditure ($16,030 (Standard error, SE=$1,931) vs $16,092 (SE=$1,573), p>0.05) and in mean number of events and expenditure for inpatient services, outpatient services, office-based visits, emergency room services, prescription drugs, and home health services (p>0.05). After adjusting for race/ethnicity, marital status, poverty category, smoking status, and comorbidities, the following expenditures were significantly (p<0.001) higher for women on AIs, compared to women on TMX: overall (62%; RR=1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.33-2.00) and for office-based visit expenditures (156%; RR=2.56, 95% CI=1.88-3.47), prescription drugs (75%; RR=1.75, 95% CI=1.33-2.32), and home health services (96%; RR=1.96, 95% CI=1.58-2.43). Number of office visits (35%; RR=1.35, 95% CI=1.17-1.56) and home health services use (19%; RR=1.19, 95% CI=1.13-1.26) were also higher for women on AIs compared to those on TMX (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among post-menopausal women with a history of breast cancer, being on an AI was associated with higher health-related expenditure, with office-based visits having the strongest influence.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)

Code

PCN78

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×