DO PAYERS VALUE RARITY? AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISEASE RARITY AND ORPHAN DRUG PRICES IN EUROPE
Author(s)
Medic G1, Korchagina D2, Young KE3, Toumi M4, Postma M5, Wille M1, Hemels M1
1Raptor Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2University of Paris-Sud, Paris, France, 3Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France, 4Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France, 5University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the relationship between the prevalence of rare diseases (rarity) and the annual treatment cost of orphan drugs (price) in Europe. METHODS: A four step process was implemented scoping France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, Sweden, UK: 1. Extraction of approved orphan drugs and disease prevalence from the European Medicines Agency website; 2. Extraction of ex-factory price from IHS POLI and country price databases; 3. Calculation of annual treatment cost per patient per drug; 4. Analysis of annual treatment costs versus disease prevalence using simple regression analysis RESULTS: A total of 120 orphan drugs were analysed for indications with a prevalence ranging from 0.001 to 5 patients per 10,000 with a mean of 1.24 per 10,000 and a median of 1 per 10,000. Results show a statistically significant inverse correlation between annual treatment cost and disease prevalence in all countries, with the treatment being more expensive the rarer the disease (France: r=-0.370, p=0.002; Germany: r=-0.365, p=0.002; Italy: r=-0.340, p=0.002; Spain: r=-0.316, p=0.041; UK: r=-0.358, p=0.0004; Sweden: r=-0.414, p=0.014; Norway: r=-0.367, p=0.002). When analysis was focused on the rarest diseases (prevalence between 0-1 per 10,000), a stronger correlation exists in all countries (France: r=-0.525, Germany: r=-0.482, Italy: r=-0.497, Spain: r=-0.531, UK: r=-0.436, Sweden: r=-0.455, Norway: r=-0.466; all p<0.05 except Sweden p=0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In all the countries in scope, this study shows an inverse correlation between annual treatment cost and disease prevalence with high statistical significance. Although pricing is a complex process where different attributes are assessed, this study supports the idea that payers in all the countries value rarity of disease in pricing decisions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)
Code
PSY24
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Disease
Rare and Orphan Diseases