DO PAYERS VALUE RARITY? AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISEASE RARITY AND ORPHAN DRUG PRICES IN EUROPE

Author(s)

Medic G1, Korchagina D2, Young KE3, Toumi M4, Postma M5, Wille M1, Hemels M1
1Raptor Pharmaceuticals Europe B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2University of Paris-Sud, Paris, France, 3Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France, 4Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France, 5University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the relationship between the prevalence of rare diseases (rarity) and the annual treatment cost of orphan drugs (price) in Europe. METHODS: A four step process was implemented scoping France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, Sweden, UK: 1. Extraction of approved orphan drugs and disease prevalence from the European Medicines Agency website; 2. Extraction of ex-factory price from IHS POLI and country price databases; 3. Calculation of annual treatment cost per patient per drug; 4. Analysis of annual treatment costs versus disease prevalence using simple regression analysis RESULTS: A total of 120 orphan drugs were analysed for indications with a prevalence ranging from 0.001 to 5 patients per 10,000 with a mean of 1.24 per 10,000 and a median of 1 per 10,000. Results show a statistically significant inverse correlation between annual treatment cost and disease prevalence in all countries, with the treatment being more expensive the rarer the disease (France: r=-0.370, p=0.002; Germany: r=-0.365, p=0.002; Italy: r=-0.340, p=0.002; Spain: r=-0.316, p=0.041; UK: r=-0.358, p=0.0004; Sweden: r=-0.414, p=0.014; Norway: r=-0.367, p=0.002). When analysis was focused on the rarest diseases (prevalence between 0-1 per 10,000), a stronger correlation exists in all countries (France: r=-0.525, Germany: r=-0.482, Italy: r=-0.497, Spain: r=-0.531, UK: r=-0.436, Sweden: r=-0.455, Norway: r=-0.466; all p<0.05 except Sweden p=0.077). CONCLUSIONS: In all the countries in scope, this study shows an inverse correlation between annual treatment cost and disease prevalence with high statistical significance. Although pricing is a complex process where different attributes are assessed, this study supports the idea that payers in all the countries value rarity of disease in pricing decisions.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)

Code

PSY24

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×