COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VEDOLIZUMAB COMPARED WITH USTEKINUMAB AS TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE CROHN´S DISEASE IN THE UNITED STATES

Author(s)

Azzabi Zouraq I1, Wilson M2, Hather G3, Curtis R4, Luo M5, Khalid JM4, Minda K1
1Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland, 2RTI Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 3Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA, 4Takeda Development Centre Europe Ltd, London, UK, 5Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA

Biologic agents are becoming the mainstay of therapy for patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s Disease (CD). Better understanding of relative cost-effectiveness of drugs with new mechanisms of action is needed to help determine the optimal positioning of these therapies in the treatment algorithm and facilitate resource allocation decisions. OBJECTIVES: A cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare vedolizumab (VDZ) versus ustekinumab (UST) for treatment of patients with moderately to severely active CD from a third-party US payer perspective. METHODS: A model combining decision-tree and Markov structures was used to predict clinical and economic outcomes at the induction and maintenance phases of treatment. This analysis considered patients who were anti-TNF naïve/non-anti-TNF refractory at the time of VDZ/UST treatment initiation within 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizon. Efficacy data were derived from a Bayesian network meta-analysis of VDZ and UST phase 3 trials; other inputs were obtained from published literature. Only direct healthcare costs were considered. Clinical outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Univariate and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to assess model robustness to parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: : Patients treated with VDZ accrued more QALYs than patients treated with UST across all time horizons: 2.479 vs. 2.406 at 5 years, 4.308 vs. 4.220 at 10 years, 10.461 vs. 10.326 in lifetime analysis. The estimated cost difference was also in favor of VDZ: -$51,432 at 5 years, -$52,676 at 10 years, -$55,523 in lifetime analysis. Univariate sensitivity analyses suggested that results are mostly sensitive to treatment response; PSA showed that VDZ is dominant in 89.6% of the simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The model predicted that VDZ treatment results in a higher number of QALYs gained at lower cost compared with UST in CD patients who had not failed a prior anti-TNF agent. Additional comparative effectiveness studies to confirm these findings are warranted.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)

Code

PGI20

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×