A COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND VALUE OF INFORMATION ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS FOR PRIMARY AXILLARY HYPERHIDROSIS IN SECONDARY CARE
Author(s)
Rice S1, Moloney E1, Stoniute J1, Wade R2, Llewellyn A2, Jones-Diette J2, Wright K2, Layton A3, Levell N4, Stansby G5, Woolacott N2, Craig D1
1Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2University of York, York, UK, 3Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK, 4Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK, 5Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost-effective sequence of interventions for the management of refractory primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care in the UK NHS, and to establish the expected value of undertaking additional research on clinical outcome and utility parameters. METHODS: A de novo probabilistic model was developed, which modelled sixty-four different treatment sequences for axillary hyperhidrosis. Treatments included: aluminium chloride, medication(M), botulinum toxin(BTX), iontophoresis(I) sponge, curettage(C) and endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy(E). A 48-year time horizon was used, with health outcomes expressed as QALYs. The perspective was that of the UK NHS and Personal Social Services. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, alongside both the population expected value of perfect- and partial perfect-information (EVPPI) for model parameters. These were calculated for different willingness to pay thresholds (WTP), incidence rates and effectiveness of treatments. Costs were calculated in GBP (£) for the 2015 price year. RESULTS: Base-case results indicated that IBMCE was the most cost-effective sequence; ICER of £9,304/QALY; probability cost-effective 0.8. The next most cost-effective sequences involved medication moving before BTX or disappearing from the sequence. This reflects the uncertainty in the effectiveness estimate of medication vs placebo. Most sensitivity and scenario analyses had little effect on the results. The population EVPPI for medication vs placebo and for curettage vs BTX effectiveness was > £3 million for all scenarios; unless the incidence of axillary hyperhidrosis was 0.5% and WTP was £20,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis found that the treatment sequence IBMCE was most cost-effective. Despite the limited evidence, iontophoresis and BTX maintained their position as first- and second-line treatment options in the majority of cost-effective sequences. The value of information analysis suggested that whilst further research of medication vs placebo may be of value, with medication either coming before BTX in the sequence or dropping out altogether.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-05, ISPOR 2017, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 5 (May 2017)
Code
PSS18
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Sensory System Disorders