US AND LATIN AMERICA- FINDING THE BEST BASE FOR SPANISH ADAPTATIONS

Author(s)

Anderson H1, Gordon-Stables R2
1ICON PLC, Abingdon, UK, 2ICON plc, Oxford, UK

OBJECTIVES: Latin America and the US are attractive locations for clinical trials, offering an enormous pool of subjects (600 million people in LATAM including Brazil and 41 million native US Spanish speakers plus 11.6 million bilingual speakers). Of 206,543 trials worldwide in 2015, the US, Mexico, and Central/South America represented 101,922. Spanish is a frequently requested language for linguistic validation. Where studies involve multiple Spanish-speaking sites, the optimal linguistic validation methodology must be decided, ideally on a case-by-case basis, depending on instrument content and the study’s practical constraints. Three methodologies are commonly used for same language, different country scenarios, described by Wild (2015): produce separate translations simultaneously for each target country; produce a translation in one country and review for each additional target country; or work with translators from each country to develop a global translation. Our objective is to examine which LATAM country is most effective as lead in Spanish harmonization or as a base for adaptation. METHODS: Five linguistic validation projects were reviewed, featuring treatment satisfaction questionnaires. The sample covers all three methodologies described above and seven countries. By directly comparing translations, we established which country emerged as the most neutral base. Terminology examined covered treatment satisfaction question stems, response options and symptoms. RESULTS: The most neutral language base was Mexican Spanish, with 91% of its translation solutions agreeable to the other countries, closely followed by Argentina Spanish (87.5%) with Costa Rica at the bottom of the scale (41%).  CONCLUSIONS: No matter which methodology is selected, a key facilitator in the process can be choosing the most neutral lead or base Spanish from which to create a version for other countries. We conclude that Mexico and Argentina are the optimal base countries. A study with a larger sample would be a worthwhile endeavour.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PRM135

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×