PRICE TRENDS AND ANALYSIS OF ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES IN THE PERIOD 1980-2014

Author(s)

Kwon CS1, Seoane-Vazquez E1, Rodriguez-Monguio R2
1MCPHS University, Boston, MA, USA, 2University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in branded antidiabetic drug prices and to evaluate factors associated with antidiabetic drug prices at market entry in the US in the period 1980-2014.

METHODS: Regulatory data were derived from the FDA. Average wholesale prices (AWP) and national average drug acquisition costs (NADAC) were derived from the RedBook (Truven Health Analytics) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, respectively. Prices were adjusted to 2014 dollars using the consumer price index (CPI) and converted to prices per 30-day supply using defined daily dose (DDD). The AWP compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) was estimated for each drug. A multivariate regression model was conducted to examine factors associated with antidiabetic drug prices at market entry.

RESULTS: In the period 1980-2014, there were 88 antidiabetic drugs (86 NDAs, 2 BLAs) marketed in the US, including 37 insulins and analogues and 51 non-insulin antidiabetic drugs. Animal-sourced insulins were excluded from analysis. The CPI-adjusted AWP CAGR from approval to December 2014, or to drug discontinuation date, was positive for antidiabetic drugs except for two inhaled insulins (one discontinued from the market), troglitazone (discontinued) and metformin/rosiglitazone. The average of NADAC per unit, as percentage of the AWP per unit on December 31, 2014, was 80.95% (n=42; range:79.50%-82.09%).

The year of market entry of insulins and analogues was associated with the CPI-adjusted AWP 30-days at market entry (p<0.001). The FDA approval date (p<0.001) and priority review process (p=0.005) of oral non-insulin antidiabetic drugs were associated with an increase in the AWP-30 days; whereas a FDA-labeled boxed warning was associated with a decrease in the AWP-30 days (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In the study period, antidiabetic drug prices increased above the inflation rate. The year of approval is significantly associated with antidiabetic drugs prices. The FDA priority review and FDA-labeled boxed warning are associated with prices of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PDB27

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×