DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF STAPLE LINE BUTTRESS IN BARIATRIC SURGERY

Author(s)

Ghosh SK1, Ryan MP2, Gache LM2, Roy S3, Fegelman E4
1Global Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 3Johnson and Johnson Global Surgery, Somerville, NJ, USA, 4Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Cincinnati, OH, USA

OBJECTIVES: Buttress material, either absorbable or permanent, is widely used in bariatric surgery.  The aim of this research was to assess differences in clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of staple line buttress in inpatient Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) surgical procedures. METHODS: Data from the Premier Perspective DatabaseTM from January 2006 to March 2014 were analyzed. Adult patients undergoing single primary SG or RYGB procedures were identified using ICD-9 codes. A keyword-based algorithm was used to identify buttress use. Assessed outcomes variables were length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, occurrence of significant bleeding (≥3units of transfusion blood product) and total cost to hospital. Differences between the buttress and non-buttress groups were evaluated using multivariate regression models for readmissions, LOS and total cost. Input variables for the regression models were buttress use, surgical characteristics, patient characteristics, patient comorbidities and hospital characteristics. RESULTS:

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PSY30

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×