ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT ADHERENCE AND UTILIZATION OF SOFOSBUVIR-BASED REGIMENS- A REAL-WORLD DATA ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Parekh MH1, Kamal K1, Miller R2, Koerner P3, Giannetti V4, Craft Z2
1Mylan School of Pharmacy Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, Carnegie, PA, USA, 3Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 4Duquesne University Mylan School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
OBJECTIVES: There has been a paradigm shift in the management of hepatitis C with the introduction of sofosbuvir-based regimens. While the focus of existing studies has been on Sustained Virologic Response (SVR), little is known about patient adherence and utilization patterns in clinical practice. METHODS: Data on clinical effectiveness, adherence, and other utilization patterns of patients using sofosbuvir-based regimens were extracted and analyzed from a national specialty pharmacy database. Patients who received one of the following FDA-approved regimens from 01/01/2013 to 30/06/2015 were included in the study: sofosbuvir+peginterferon+ribavirin (SOF+PR), sofosbuvir+ribavirin (SOF+R), sofosbuvir+simeprevir (SOF+SIM), or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV). Effectiveness data (SVR), adherence [medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC)], and demographic profiles of patients utilizing these regimens were analyzed. The data was analyzed using SPSS Version-22. RESULTS: A total of 1,361 patients were identified from the pharmacy database and based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, 507 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 55.1 years (+/-9.88), 64.7% were male and 91.9% had commercial insurance. Sixty-one percent were treatment-naïve and 72% of all patients had genotype 1. Seventy-one percent of patients had at least one other co-morbidity, with liver disease and cirrhosis being the most common comorbidity. A majority of the patients used SOF+PR (36.1%), followed by SOF+SIM (30.8%), SOF+R (25.6%), and SOF/LDV (7.5%). Only 9% patients experienced side effects. SVR rates were above 90% for all regimens, except SOF+PR and SOF+R in treatment-experienced patients. Adherence rates were highest with MPR-80 (95.9%-100%) and lowest with PDC-90 (83.5%-90.1%). However, no significant difference was found across regimens. Of the 1,361 patients, treatment discontinuation due to side effects was only 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The study is one of the first to describe the real world utilization of sofosbuvir-based regimens. Improving adherence of these expensive regimens has the potential to reduce costs and improve patient outcomes in hepatitis C.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)
Code
PHS50
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)