A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY TO COMPARE THE MEDICATION COSTS OF AN HIV POPULATION IN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES BETWEEN THE PHYSICIAN-MANAGED AND PHARMACIST-MANAGED GROUPS

Author(s)

Vu H1, Shaya FT1, Barnes V2, Seo H2, Rodriguez de Bittner M1
1University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2Correct Rx Pharmacy Services, Hanover, MD, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare the average antiretroviral medication cost (AAMC), the average total medication cost (ATMC) and the average percentile total medication cost (APTMC) of HIV patients in a physician managed (MDM) and pharmacist managed (PHM) HIV patient groups in correctional facilities from July 2014 until September 2015. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from pharmacy administrative claims during the study period. The MDM group and the PHM group were determined based on the availability of pharmacists at the correctional facilities. The HIV patients were randomly distributed based on the prisoner system. The HIV population in each cohort was determined as those patients on any antiretroviral medications from the claim data. The AAMC, ATMC and APTMC of HIV patients from two groups were calculated. T-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for the statistical analysis between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were in the MDM cohort and 864 patients were in PHM cohort. The AAMC, ATMC and APTMC per HIV patient were statistically significant lower in the PHM group than the MDM group ($16,043.7±$14,931.8 vs $28,740.7±$12,809.0, p<0.0001; $16,877.6±$17,806.0 vs $33,033.8± $47,261.6, p<0.0001; 96.33±7.92 vs 98.40±1.54, p<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend indicating that the pharmacists managed group had a lower medication cost than the physician managed group.  More analysis is needed to examine differences between the groups to clearly articulate the role and interventions of the pharmacists versus the physicians in HIV management in the correctional facilities. In addition, it would be important to identify the areas where pharmacists have the greatest impact.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-05, ISPOR 2016, Washington DC, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 3 (May 2016)

Code

PHS19

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×