RELATIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF VORTIOXETINE VERSUS APPROVED ANTIDEPRESSANTS FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER- A META-REGRESSION OF CLINICAL TRIALS
Author(s)
Diamand F1, Danchenko N1, Brignone M1, Rive B1, Perez V2, Ereshefsky L3, Francois C4, Merikle E5
1Lundbeck S.A.S. Paris Fr, EU, Paris, France, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Parexel International, Glendale, CA, USA, 4Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA, 5Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA
OBJECTIVES: Vortioxetine, a novel antidepressant exhibiting a multimodal mechanism of action, was approved for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This extension study of a recently published meta-analysis (Llorca et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30(12):2589-606) compares the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine with seven commonly used antidepressants marketed in the US. METHODS: Indirect comparisons using meta-regression, an extension of random-effects meta-analysis, were performed using data from 54 double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 pivotal studies identified in a systematic review (N= 18,312 patients). To ensure study comparability, only experimental drug and placebo arms were included in primary analyses. Study-level standardized effect sizes were regressed on active treatment to compare efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine with branded (levomilnacipran, vilazodone, desvenlafaxine) and generic (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, venlafaxine) antidepressants. Efficacy was defined as change from baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale after 2 months (6-12 weeks) of treatment. Tolerability was defined as the withdrawal rate due to any adverse event. RESULTS: Standardized mean differences for vortioxetine compared with the selected antidepressants (negative estimates favor vortioxetine) were: duloxetine, 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12, 0.32); escitalopram, -0.04 (95% CI: -0.32, 0.24); sertraline, -0.02 (95% CI: -0.39, 0.34); venlafaxine, 0.14 (95% CI: -0.11, 0.39); levomilnacipran, -0.05 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.19); vilazodone, -0.23 (95% CI: -0.53, 0.06); and desvenlafaxine, 0.04 (95% CI: -0.16, 0.23). Significantly lower withdrawal rates were observed for vortioxetine versus sertraline, venlafaxine, and desvenlafaxine (all P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in withdrawal rates was observed between vortioxetine and duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, or vilazodone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that vortioxetine offers a comparable combination of efficacy and tolerability in MDD to other antidepressants marketed in the US.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PMH47
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Mental Health