RELATIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF VORTIOXETINE VERSUS APPROVED ANTIDEPRESSANTS FOR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER- A META-REGRESSION OF CLINICAL TRIALS

Author(s)

Diamand F1, Danchenko N1, Brignone M1, Rive B1, Perez V2, Ereshefsky L3, Francois C4, Merikle E5
1Lundbeck S.A.S. Paris Fr, EU, Paris, France, 2Analysis Group, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Parexel International, Glendale, CA, USA, 4Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA, 5Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: Vortioxetine, a novel antidepressant exhibiting a multimodal mechanism of action, was approved for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This extension study of a recently published meta-analysis (Llorca et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2014;30(12):2589-606) compares the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine with seven commonly used antidepressants marketed in the US. METHODS: Indirect comparisons using meta-regression, an extension of random-effects meta-analysis, were performed using data from 54 double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 pivotal studies identified in a systematic review (N= 18,312 patients). To ensure study comparability, only experimental drug and placebo arms were included in primary analyses. Study-level standardized effect sizes were regressed on active treatment to compare efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine with branded (levomilnacipran, vilazodone, desvenlafaxine) and generic (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, venlafaxine) antidepressants. Efficacy was defined as change from baseline on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale after 2 months (6-12 weeks) of treatment. Tolerability was defined as the withdrawal rate due to any adverse event. RESULTS: Standardized mean differences for vortioxetine compared with the selected antidepressants (negative estimates favor vortioxetine) were: duloxetine, 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12, 0.32); escitalopram, -0.04 (95% CI:  -0.32, 0.24); sertraline, -0.02 (95% CI: -0.39, 0.34); venlafaxine, 0.14 (95% CI: -0.11, 0.39); levomilnacipran, -0.05 (95% CI: -0.28, 0.19); vilazodone, -0.23 (95% CI: -0.53, 0.06); and desvenlafaxine, 0.04 (95% CI: -0.16, 0.23).  Significantly lower withdrawal rates were observed for vortioxetine versus sertraline, venlafaxine, and desvenlafaxine (all P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in withdrawal rates was observed between vortioxetine and duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, or vilazodone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that vortioxetine offers a comparable combination of efficacy and tolerability in MDD to other antidepressants marketed in the US.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PMH47

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×