PHYSICIANS' VIEWS ON PHARMA ROLE IN REAL WORLD EVIDENCE GENERATION IN POLAND
Author(s)
Skrzekowska-Baran I1, Wierzbicka N1, Zmiejko S2
1Janssen-Cilag Polska, Warsaw, Poland, 2Sequence HC Partners, Warsaw, Poland
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Real World Evidence (RWE) is likely to become increasingly important in decisions that affect patient’s access to medicines worldwideHowever, absence of long-term patient registries and electronic documentation constitute the greatest barriers for generating RWE studies in Poland. Therefore, an exploratory survey was undertaken to map current awareness and expectations of physicians related to practical outcomes data and to identify pharmaceutical industry’s role in RWE generation. METHODS: The study was conducted across 6 doctors’ specialties: diabetology(n=30), virology(n=42), oncology(n=28), hematology(n=62), dermatology(n=14) and psychiatry(n=72), others(n=3) from outpatient and inpatient care. The survey consisted of qualitative and quantitative questions covering areas such as the most trusted sources of RWE in Poland, pharma role in RWE generation vs. government’s contribution, most desired type of RWE. The questionnaires were collected Sept-Nov 2014 (the total number of responses received n=251). Data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Physicians demonstrated high degree of interest in evidence on practical outcomes, particularly in data on safety and effectiveness of treatment (over 90% of responders); at the same time 1 out of 5 doctors claimed that data on effectiveness are hardly accessible in Poland. Interesting differences regarding desired real life data were observed across specialties: i.e. treatment pathways and prescribing patterns were frequently valued by diabetologists (87%), while quality of life was often quoted by hematologists (87%). For psychiatrists (69%) data on direct treatment costs are highly important whereas data on patient compliance was most often mentioned by oncologists (79%). CONCLUSIONS: The research showed high physicians’ interest in practical evidence and the variety of RWE perception. The differences in priorities between specializations indicate unmet needs in therapeutic areas. Broadening doctor’s and other stakeholders knowledge in RWE data significance and improving its accessibility could be crucial for gaining doctor’s advocacy for shaping RWE landscape in Poland and, consequently, for improving patient’s treatment results.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PHP158
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Organizational Practices, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Academic & Educational, Approval & Labeling, Registries
Disease
Multiple Diseases