FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE VERSUS CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY GUIDED MANAGEMENT IN NON-ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION- A HEALTH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Nam J1, Briggs A1, Layland J1, Oldroyd K2, Curzen N1, Sood A1, Balachandran K1, Das R1, Eteiba H1, Petrie M1, Lindsay M1, Watkins S1, O'Donnell A1, McConnachie A1, Henderson R1, Berry C1
1University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 2West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Glasgow, UK
OBJECTIVES: Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction are managed based visual assessment of coronary angiography, which can be inaccurate and subjective. A randomized pilot trial has investigated an alternative approach using physiology-guided management with fractional flow reserve that may optimize outcomes. Objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided management vs. coronary angiography. METHODS: A trial-based economic evaluation was conducted (n=350). We adopted a UK National Health Service perspective. Part I of the analysis used raw, unadjusted costs and QALYs assembled using individual resource use and EQ5D responses from the RCT. Part II used statistical modelling to model the effect pathway of FFR by conditioning total costs and QALYs on the treatment decision (coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)). Results were then applied to treatment decision distributions following FFR or standard care management. Uncertainty in GLM coefficients, unit cost parameters and sampling were incorporated using bootstrapping and Monte Carlo methods. RESULTS: FFR reduced revascularization by PCI or CABG (OR 0.52; 95%CI: 0.28 – 0.94; p=0.022). Part I: FFR led to a mean cost savings (£8,253 vs. £8,603; difference: –£305 [SD=£519]). Likely drivers of cost savings were length of stay (-£331 [£342]) and index year health events (-£217 [£223]). However, low information size contributed to their large imprecision. Incremental QALYs were comparable (0.811 vs. 0.799; diff: 0.013 [0.023]). Part II: FFR led again to a mean cost savings (£8,328 vs. £8,532; difference: –£204 [£305]) and comparable incremental QALYs (0.801 vs. 0.806; diff: –0.005 [0.004]). The probability of cost-effectiveness remained comparable over common willingness-to-pay (70-75%). CONCLUSIONS: Early evidence suggests FFR may be cost saving and comparable in QALYs. However, considerable uncertainty persists. We also prescribe specific design considerations for a future trial, including information size suggestions, follow-up frequency and outcomes to aid modelling/lifetime extrapolation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PMD47
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders