DETERMINING PATTERNS OF OPIOID MISUSE AND MISPRESCRIBING IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Author(s)

Qureshi Z1, Ball S2, Horner R1, Kreiner P3, Lopez-Defede A1, Probst J4, Bennett C5
1University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, 2South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Charleston, SC, USA, 3Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA, 4University of South Carolina, COLUMBIA, SC, USA, 5University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, USA

OBJECTIVES: Although opioids play a central role in the treatment, and palliation of many medical conditions, there is a large and growing problem of abuse nationally and in South Carolina particularly. According to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, more than 5 million Americans abused prescription opioid painkillers in January 2011. Reports show an increase in cases of doctor shopping, prescription forgery, illicit prescribing and dispensing, and other diversion activities. We determine patterns of opioid prescribing in South Carolina through an epidemiologic analysis and geo-spatial mapping of South Carolina prescription data for 2010-2011. METHODS: Using de-identified data from the South Carolina Reporting and Identification Prescription Tracking System (SCRIPTS), we conducted a state-wide epidemiological analysis of patient and prescriber opioid prescribing patterns including distributions of number of prescriptions, number of prescribers and of pharmacies used by each patient. Additionally, we conducted County- and Zip Code-level analyses of opioid prescribing patterns. RESULTS: Prescriber deciles were created representing 10% groupings of prescribers based on controlled substances (CS) II – IV prescription volume. The top 10% of SC prescribers wrote more than 60% (N=2,158,574) of the total CS II – IV prescriptions in 2010, and  58% of total opioid prescriptions. The top pharmacy decile dispensed about 44% of total prescriptions and about 37% of opioid prescriptions. Five Zip Codes had the highest percent of opioid prescriptions out of total prescriptions (Charleston, Richland, Greenville, Barnwell and Aiken). In 2010 counties with the highest percent of prescriptions (>61%) were Greenville, Richland, Barnwell and Charleston, whereas in 2011 the counties with the highest percent of prescriptions were Greenville, Chester, Richland and Charleston. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a relatively small percentage of providers, concentrated in a few counties, account for most opioid prescriptions.  This group represents a potential target for physician education and engagement in handling pain management and appropriate use of opioids.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)

Code

PSY63

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Health Care Research, Prescribing Behavior, Pricing Policy & Schemes

Disease

Multiple Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×