COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF THREE TYPES OF INFLUENZA VACCINES (TRIVALENT, TRIVALENT HIGH DOSE AND QUADRIVALENT) IN ADULTS AGED 65 AND OLDER UNDER UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM (UIIP) IN ONTARIO, CANADA
Author(s)
Cheng X1, Roïz J2
1City University London, London, UK, 2Creativ-Ceutical, London, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This research aims to assess the economic impact and cost-utility of replacing trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV3) with the newer influenza vaccines – trivalent high dose (HD) or quadrivalent (IIV4) influenza vaccine in adults aged 65 and older under Ontario’s Universal Influenza Immunization Program (UIIP) from healthcare and societal perspectives. METHODS: An analytical decision model was developed for the elderly (age 65-74, 75-84, and 85 and above) at two levels of health risks (high and low) with influenza-related health outcomes from Ontario or Canada. Ontario’s demographic data and labor costs were extracted from Statistics Canada. Vaccine efficacies were based on post-marketing clinical study for HD and estimated from published literatures for IIV4. Antiviral treatment and over-the-counter medication costs were considered. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Additional analysis was performed for long-term impact of influenza infections. RESULTS: Comparing to IIV3 under UIIP, IIV3 HD has a net societal budget impact of C$346,809 including premature deaths in a single influenza season. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is C$3,763 per QALY gained from healthcare perspective and C$190 per QALY gained from societal perspective. Replacing IIV3 with IIV4 would result a net societal budget impact of over C$3 million. The ICER of IIV4 vs IIV3 is C$20,733 per QALY gained from healthcare perspective and societally C$16,232 per QALY gained. At $50,000 per QALY gained threshold, 100% and 93.8% of PSA simulations were cost-effective for HD and IIV4, respectively, from healthcare perspective, and 95.3% for IIV4 from societal perspective. HD becomes a dominant alternative when long-term care costs are considered. CONCLUSIONS: Both HD and IIV4 are expected to reduce influenza-associated morbidity and mortality, and are cost-effective in the studied population comparing to IIV3; however, IIV4 is extended dominated by HD. Those conclusions were proven to be robust in sensitivity analyses.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PIN34
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)