CHANGES IN HEALTHCARE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TREATMENT OF BIPOLAR DISORDER FOLLOWING INITIATION OF ASENAPINE VERSUS ARIPIPRAZOLE
Author(s)
Chitnis A1, Wang R1, Sun SX2, Dixit S2, Tawah A1, Boulanger L1
1Evidera, Lexington, MA, USA, 2Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in healthcare costs associated with initiation of asenapine versus aripiprazole among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: We used two large US healthcare claims databases that collectively included commercially insured patients aged <65 years and Medicare enrollees to identify all adults (≥18 years) with BD (ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes 296.0X, 296.1X, 296.4X, 296.6X, 296.7X, 296.80, 296.81, 296.89) who began therapy with asenapine or aripiprazole between 2009 and 2012. Patients without continuous enrollment for the 6-month periods before and after the date of the first prescription claim for asenapine or aripiprazole (“index date”) were excluded. Asenapine patients were then matched to aripiprazole patients using propensity scoring to control for differences between the groups. HRU and associated costs (2012 dollars) were deemed BD-related based on the presence of a BD diagnosis code on the relevant claim. Within each group, differences in BD-related HRU and costs were estimated between the pre- and post- index periods, and then compared across groups. RESULTS: A total of 2680 patients were included in the analyses (n=1,340 for each group); the groups were comparable with respect to age (mean age: 42.8 years for asenapine patients vs. 42.2 years for aripiprazole patients, p=0.27), percent female (70.3% vs. 70.1%, p=0.90), and Charlson comorbidity index (mean: 0.45 vs. 0.42, p=0.55). Asenapine patients had nearly a twofold greater decrease in total BD-related healthcare costs than aripiprazole patients (mean: -$863 for asenapine vs. -$490 for aripiprazole, p<0.05); BD-related outpatient costs also exhibited a significant decrease ($-2 vs. a $10 increase for aripiprazole patients, p<0.05). While pharmacy costs increased in both groups, the increase was significantly lower among asenapine patients ($886 vs. $1,518, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with aripiprazole, asenapine was associated with a reduction in total healthcare costs related to BD during the 6-month period following therapy initiation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2015-05, ISPOR 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 2015)
Code
PMH31
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Mental Health