WHAT ARE THE IMAGES USED TO DIAGNOSE AND ASSESS SUSPECTED STROKES?- A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF CARE IN FOUR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Author(s)

Peultier A1, Redekop WK2, Severens JL2
1iBMG, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES:

The cost-effectiveness of clinical interventions is often assessed using current care as a comparator. However, various imaging options are available in current stroke care and evidence suggests clinical practice variation in acute stroke imaging across European countries. This research aims to describe the patterns of stroke imaging, examine variations across four selected countries and obtain results that will be used in future cost-effectiveness analyses of imaging strategies.

METHODS:

A systematic literature review was conducted. Embase, Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were researched in August 2016. The search strategy focused on the current imaging workup used in acute stroke care in clinical practice in Hungary, Germany, Sweden and the UK. Characteristics extracted from these studies included the type and number of health centres and patients, the study design and goal and information about the data found. Information regarding the type and frequency of imaging techniques used was extracted and analysed.

RESULTS:

The literature search yielded 3616 records. Sixteen eligible studies were identified for final analysis. The complete imaging methods used to diagnose stroke patients were poorly documented. Computed Tomography (CT) appeared to be the main diagnostic imaging used in stroke care (for 78 to 98% of patient profiles across the 3 countries over different periods). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was reported to be substantially less used. Studies performed in the UK revealed dramatic variations in the proportion of scanned patients and timing of imaging.

CONCLUSIONS:

The imaging strategy documentation, the proportion of patients scanned and the timing of imaging is insufficiently described in the literature. The heterogeneity in stroke imaging observed in this study reinforces the need to compare the quality of care in terms of process and outcomes within and between countries. Research is also needed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of different imaging strategies.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PMD121

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×