THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF PEOPLE WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA FOLLOWING AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANT AND BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN
Author(s)
Jones B1, Ward T1, Harrison JP2, Hurst M1, Tyas D2, McEwan P1, Gordon J1
1Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
OBJECTIVES: Treatment of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) is highly effective in early lines of treatment; however, for patients who relapse or become refractory after receiving both autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) and brentuximab vedotin (BV), treatment options are extremely limited. Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that may potentially offer significant improvements in disease control and quality-of-life over standards of care (SoC) in this setting. Additionally, nivolumab may enable allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT), a potentially curative procedure. The objective of this study was to estimate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of nivolumab compared to SoC. METHODS: A three-state Markov disease progression and cost-effectiveness model of CHL was developed. Relative efficacy was established by naïve and adjusted comparisons of patient-level clinical trial data (nivolumab; CA209-039 and CheckMate 205 B and C) with a retrospective study (SoC; Cheah 2016). Costs were derived from published UK estimates; remaining model inputs were consistent with previous UK health technology assessments. A lifetime horizon was applied; costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% annually (£GBP 2014-15). An additional scenario was modelled in which a proportion of patients received allo-HCT after 6 months of treatment, dependent on response. RESULTS: Nivolumab resulted in an estimated additional 2.80 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 2.90 life years versus SoC, with 1.67 years spent in the pre-progression state and 3.34 years in the post-progression state (versus 0.41 and 1.70 years for SoC, respectively). Estimated incremental costs were £82,897 with a resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £29,631/QALY. Assuming a proportion of patients receive allo-HCT resulted in an ICER of £16,457/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is estimated to offer significant benefit in terms of improved survival and quality-of-life whilst offering a cost-effective alternative to SoC, addressing a significant unmet need in people with relapsed or refractory cHL who have received both auto-HCT and BV.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN120
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology, Systemic Disorders/Conditions