REAL-WORLD MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA IN ROMANIA AND POLAND
Author(s)
Dytfeld D1, Coriu D2, Fink L3, Hemetsberger M4, Bjorklof K5, Toka KS5, Gatta F5, Niepel D5
1University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, France, 2University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, France, 3Kantar Health, Paris, France, 4Hemetsberger Medical Services, Vienna, Austria, 5Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland
OBJECTIVES: Understanding symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) patient management, treatment patterns and outcomes in real-world practice in Romania and Poland. METHODS: Data were collected through a cross-sectional (X) and retrospective (R) chart review (June/15–June/16) by oncologists/haematologists managing ≥15 symptomatic MM patients per month and responsible for treatment initiation. The X-phase collected clinical characteristics and treatment for MM patients seen during a 3–4 week time-frame. The R-phase recorded disease characteristics, including treatment response and duration. Each physician included patients who completed within 3 months the following lines of therapy: 3 first-line (1L) patients, 4 second-line (2L) patients and 7 third-line or later (3L+) patients. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: The X-phase included 158 and 60 patients in Romania and Poland respectively, of whom 56% and 52% were <65 years. 72% of patients in Romania and 85% in Poland were currently undergoing treatment: in Romania, 1L, 2L and 3L+ treatments were mainly bortezomib-based (67%, 81% and 57% respectively); in Poland, 1L treatments were bortezomib and thalidomide-based (each 39%), while 2L and 3L+ regimens were mainly bortezomib (50%) and lenalidomide-based (70%). The R-phase included 52 patients in Romania and 55 in Poland; 60% and 49%, respectively, were <65 years. Physician-assessed depth of response decreased in later lines: 44% and 42% of patients in Romania and Poland achieved at least a very good partial response (≥VGPR) in 1L, while 21% and 16% of patients achieved ≥VGPR in 3L+. Median treatment durations across lines in Romania and Poland were 6 months each for bortezomib-based regimens, 12 and 6 months for lenalidomide-based regimens, and 5 and 7 months for thalidomide-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Low response rates from 2L onwards and short median treatment duration suggest a need for more innovative and effective treatments and treatment combinations in both countries, to help avoid potential re-treatment with same agent and associated cumulative toxicities.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN263
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Hospital and Clinical Practices, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Oncology, Systemic Disorders/Conditions