QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF EXTERNAL EVENT VALIDATION PROCEDURES PERFORMED IN PUBLISHED HEALTH ECONOMIC MODELS IN OBESITY- OUTCOMES OF A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Author(s)

Schwander B1, Nuijten M2, Hiligsmann M3, Evers S3
1AHEAD GmbH, Loerrach, Germany, 2A2M, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: For assessing the long-term health economic impact of obesity programs, modelling techniques are frequently applied to project obesity-associated events over time. To obtain information on the predictive quality of the applied event simulations, which ensures the acceptance of results from economic evaluations, published external event validation approaches were identified, reviewed and analyzed.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed in Pubmed and NHSEED to identify decision models for full health economic assessments (HEA) in obesity. For each included study we extracted information on the external event validation approach, using the best practice recommendations of the report on “Model Transparency and Validation” issued by the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force.

RESULTS: We identified 87 papers and 83% (72 of 87) simulated obesity-associated events. Only ten models (≈11%) performed an external validation and only for one the predictiveness of the event simulation was investigated in a cohort of obese subjects. Considering other ISPOR best practice criteria we have found that for none of these external validation cases a systematic identification of suitable data sources was performed, and that a justification of the data source selection, due to predefined criteria, was identified only in three cases. However an adequate result presentation (simulation results provided for each source, presentation of discrepancies, and a qualitative measure on fit) was provided for most external validation cases (≥ eight cases).

CONCLUSIONS: We have found that only a limited number of published decision models for full HEAs in obesity have applied an external event validation. In addition, those who conducted external validation suffers from major limitations including the data source selection process, as only in one case, obesity cohorts were used as basis for the validation procedure. Thus in conclusion published obesity models lack information on the predictive quality of the applied event simulation approaches.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PRM131

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Modeling and simulation

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×