NICE AND SINGLE? RECOMMENDATION RATES OF ONCOLOGY THERAPIES APPROVED ON CLINICAL TRIAL PACKAGES LACKING COMPARATIVE PHASE 3 DATA

Author(s)

Macaulay R1, Anell B2
1PAREXEL International, London, UK, 2PAREXEL International, Stockholm, Sweden

OBJECTIVES:

The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) makes recommendations on the reimbursement of new medicines based upon their clinical and cost-effectiveness (as defined by their incremental cost per additional Quality Adjusted Life Year [QALY])

METHODS: NICE single technology appraisal (STA) guidance for systemic anti-cancer therapies was screened (01/01/2009-31/05/2017) and the recommendation and supportive trial package extracted.

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS: NICE have recommended 5/6 oncology STAs supported by a clinical trial package lacking comparative data. The trend for such appraisals is increasing with most having been conducted in the last 12 months. The clinical benchmark of EMA approval for oncology drugs on such a data package seems sufficient to enable acceptance under NICE’s clinical criteria. Nevertheless, NICE’s recommendations are further conditional on cost-effectiveness being adequately demonstrated. Additional price discounts and/or innovative contracting may frequently be required to offset the inherent uncertainties on conducting economic modelling based on such limited clinical data package.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN251

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Risk-sharing Approaches

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×