Author(s)
Kandel M1, Allayous C2, Dalle S3, Dalac S4, Saiag P5, Lacour J6, Descamps V7, Maubec E7, Lesimple T8, Stoebner P9, Arnault J10, Dupuy A11, Stephan A12, Guillot B13, Dreno B14, Ballon A2, Lebbe C2, Borget I15
1INSERM DR Paris 11, Villejuif, France, 2Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France, 3Hospices Civils de Lyon Hospital, Cancer research center of Lyon, Lyon, France, 4Dijon Hospital, Dijon, France, 5Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne Billancourt, France, 6Nice Hospital, Nice, France, 7Bichat Hospital, Paris, France, 8CLCC Rennes Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France, 9Nîmes Hospital, Nîmes, France, 10Amiens Hospital, Amiens, France, 11Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France, 12Caen Hospital, Caen, France, 13Montpellier Hospital, Montpellier, France, 14Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes Cedex 1, France, 15Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
OBJECTIVES: The management of metastatic melanoma (MM) patients has known huge advances since 6 years, with seven innovative and expensive drugs being now available. In France, the economic burden of MM was estimated at 1653 € per patient in 2004 (Chevalier and al), with treatment representing 17% of the total cost. The therapeutic revolution points out how important reassessing the cost of management is. The objective of the present study is to estimate the cost of management of MM in France. METHODS: Costs were estimated through MelBase cohort, which is a prospective French multicentric clinical and biological cohort dedicated to the follow-up of adults with MM. Costs were assessed from the French national health insurance perspective. Resources use were prospectively collected since the inclusion of the patient until their last follow-up in MelBase, including cost of treatments, hospitalizations, specialists visits, imaging procedures, biological exams and radiotherapy. Valuation was done using national tariffs. RESULTS: Costs estimations were based on 483 patients included between March 2013 and December 2016. The median follow-up is 11 months with 250 (52%) patients dead. Mean age was 65 years old. In first line, 213 (44%) patients were treated by immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), 203 (42%) by BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, cobimetinib), 48 (10%) by chemotherapy and 19 (4%) were included in a clinical trial. The mean total cost per patient treated for MM was evaluated at 107,846€ [CI: 8,889;323,771] with 91,613€ [CI: 813;309,086] for the treatments, 12,676€ [CI: 586;40,034] for the hospitalizations, 1,599€ [CI: 92;4,113] for the radiotherapy, 1,005€ [CI: 61;3,883] for the biological exam, 959€ [CI:121;2,956] for imaging procedures. Treatment represented 85 % of the total cost and is the main cost driver. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2004, the management cost of patient with MM was multiplied by 65, mainly driven by the evolution of the treatment costs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN89
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Oncology