ESTIMATING THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF TREATMENT WITH ALPHA-BLOCKER PLUS ANTIMUSCARINIC AS A FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION (FDC) TABLET VERSUS CONCOMITANT COMBINATION THERAPY (CCT) IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS (LUTS) ASSOCIATED WITH BENIGN ...

Author(s)

Bowditch S1, McCrea C2, Arbe E1, Nazir J1
1Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Chertsey, UK, 2PAREXEL Access Consulting, London, UK

OBJECTIVES:

European guidelines recommend combination therapy with an alpha‑blocker plus antimuscarinic in men with LUTS/BPH and residual storage symptoms after monotherapy treatment with either drug. Using predominantly real‑world evidence, this study estimated the cost of treating men with LUTS/BPH with alpha-blocker plus antimuscarinic therapy given as a FDC tablet or as CCT in the Netherlands from a societal perspective.

METHODS:

A Markov model with monthly cycles and 1-year time horizon was developed. Men with LUTS/BPH (n=100) receive daily treatment with FDC solifenacin 6mg plus TOCAS 0.4mg or CCT alpha‑blocker plus antimuscarinic (fesoterodine 4mg, oxybutynin immediate-release [IR] 15mg, solifenacin 5mg, tolterodine extended-release [ER] 4mg, tolterodine IR 4 mg, darifenacin 7.5mg). At the end of each cycle, men persist on treatment, discontinue treatment, switch combination therapy or undergo surgery. Model inputs, derived from the literature and real-world evidence, included 1-year treatment persistence and switching, mortality, direct medical costs and lost productivity. A one-way sensitivity analysis determined the influence of key inputs on the results.

RESULTS:

A higher proportion of the cohort persisted on treatment with FDC solifenacin plus TOCAS versus the comparators (52.1% vs. 25.8–32.6%). FDC solifenacin plus TOCAS was associated with reduced resource use, including fewer surgeries (n=20.8 vs. 29.0–31.8) and work hours lost (n=1387 vs. 2073–2348), and higher drug acquisition costs (€31,110.13 vs. €4,935.58–25,984.60) versus the comparators. Overall, total estimated annual costs were €117,603.48 (€3.22/patient/day) for FDC solifenacin plus TOCAS versus €122,723.28–153,854.48 (€3.36–4.21/patient/day) for the comparators. Key drivers of the results were 1-year persistence and switching treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the Netherlands, FDC solifenacin plus TOCAS is associated with lower resource use, fewer work hours lost, and lower total costs. These results may suggest a clinical and economic benefit of FDC solifenacin plus TOCAS compared with concomitant alpha‑blocker plus antimuscarinic therapies in men with LUTS/BPH.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PUK10

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×