COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION IN ADVANCED MELANOMA - A CLAIMS ANALYSIS USING A NOVEL STAGING ALGORITHM

Author(s)

Song J1, Goldschmidt D2, Driver M1, Buchanan J3, Murugappan S4
1Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2Analysis Group, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 3Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA, 4Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the real-world costs associated with disease progression among patients with advanced melanoma.

METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma that progressed from non-visceral (stage IIIA/B/C and IVM1a) to visceral (stage IVM1b and IVM1c) disease were identified using a novel clinical algorithm based on secondary neoplasm diagnoses, melanoma treatments, and elevated lactic dehydrogenase level in three US claims databases (2009-2015). Each progressed patient was matched with a patient whose disease remained non-visceral (non-progressed) based on age and gender. Each non-progressed patient's observed period was divided into quasi pre- and post-"progression" periods, such that the pre-"progression" duration matched that of the corresponding progressed patient. Differences between pre- and post-progression per-patient-per-month all-cause direct healthcare costs were reported in 2015 US dollars and compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and generalized estimating equations, adjusting for first observed non-visceral stage, comorbidities, and region of residence.

RESULTS: The analyses included 2,126 patients (1,063 per cohort). Mean age was 58 years and 65% were male. On average, patients had 9 months of observed pre-progression period. Compared to non-progressed patients, a larger proportion of progressed patients were initially diagnosed with stage IVM1A instead of stage III (35% vs. 13%; p<0.001). Progressed patients also had more comorbidities, with significantly higher rates of mild liver disease (11% vs. 4%; p<0.001), cerebrovascular disease (6% vs. 3%; p=0.01), and myocardial infarction (2% vs. 1%; p=0.041) during the 6 months before progression. From the pre- to the post-progression period, progressed patients saw an average increase in costs ($5,467) compared to a decrease for non-progressed patients (-$3,260), with a difference-in-difference of $8,727 (p<0.001), which decreased to $8,627 (p<0.001) after adjusting for patient characteristics. The largest driver of this difference was outpatient costs ($2,631 vs. $-2,233; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Progression to visceral melanoma is associated with significantly higher costs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCN91

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×