COST IMPLICATIONS OF TEDIZOLID INTRODUCTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED SKIN AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS IN A RUSSIAN MULTI-FIELD HOSPITAL
Author(s)
Belkova YA1, Rachina SA2, Kozlov RS1, Golub AV1, Portnyagina US3, Shamaeva SH3
1Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia, 2RUDN University, Moscow, Russia, 3Republican Hospital #2, Centre for Emergency Medicine, Yakutsk, Russian Federation
OBJECTIVES: Tedizolid is a novel oxazolidinone for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) including those caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA). We aimed to estimate budget impact following the introduction of tedizolid for the treatment of suspected or documented MRSA cSSTIs in a Russian multi-field hospital. METHODS: Budget impact model of MRSA cSSTIs management was built based on the results of network meta-analyses (R. McCool et al., 2015; J.F. Logman et al., 2010), randomized controlled trials, observational studies and experts’ opinion. Tedizolid introduction as linezolid replacement in a simulated cohort of 100 inpatients with suspected or documented MRSA cSSTIs was assessed for 1 year time horizon. Treatment durations for tedizolid and linezolid were modelled at 6 and 10 days, respectively, consistent with drug labels and meta-analyses data. Direct and opportunity medical costs were considered. Need for second-line treatment courses, de-escalation therapy and gram-negative coverage was accounted for each regimen. Unit costs were extracted from official sources. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted on key model parameters. RESULTS: The budget for the treatment of 100 inpatients with suspected or documented MRSA cSSTIs with linezolid and tedizolid was €94578 and €55230 respectively, including €61265 and €60538 of medications costs respectively. Replacement of linezolid with tedizolid will result in €39348 total budget savings (including €727 savings on drugs) and hospital bed usage optimisation by 31.6%. Results were sensitive to change in linezolid and tedizolid treatment courses duration and costs and to the amount of cSSTI management reimbursement. Tedizolid introduction becomes cost-ineffective for treatment courses ≥9 days long. Uncertainty of other parameters within reasonable limits had no impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid is a cost saving alternative to linezolid for the treatment of suspected or documented MRSA cSSTIs in a Russian multi-field hospital.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PIN23
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)