COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SECUKINUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS IN THE UK

Author(s)

Emery P1, van Keep M2, Beard SM3, Graham CN4, Miles L4, Jugl SM5, Gunda P6, Halliday A7, Marzo-Ortega H8
1University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2BresMed Netherlands BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 3BresMed, Sheffield, UK, 4RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 5Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 6Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India, 7Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Camberley, Surrey, UK, 8NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab, a fully human IL-17A inhibitor, for adult patients in the UK with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have not responded adequately to previous treatment with conventional care (CC) or previous biologic therapy.

METHODS:

A de novo combined decision tree/Markov state-transition model was developed to evaluate two populations: 1) biologic-naïve patients with an inadequate response to CC; 2) biologic-experienced patients with an inadequate response to prior biologic treatment. Comparators were licensed anti-TNF therapies and CC in the two populations, respectively. Clinical parameters captured treatment response rates, short-term treatment effects on disease activity and patient functioning, and long-term impact of structural disease progression. Utility values were derived from secukinumab trial data via regression methods. List prices were used for all drugs; where available, other costs were sourced from NHS reference costs. Outcomes included total discounted costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The analysis perspective was the UK NHS in 2017.

RESULTS:

In the biologic-naïve population, secukinumab dominated adalimumab and infliximab and was associated with ICERs of <£20,000 per QALY gained compared to certolizumab pegol and etanercept. Secukinumab was less costly and associated with a minor decrement in QALYs versus golimumab, saving £19,782 per QALY foregone. In biologic-experienced patients, the ICER for secukinumab versus CC was £4,817 per QALY gained. At a £20,000 per QALY gained threshold, the probability of secukinumab being the most cost-effective intervention was estimated to be 45.5% in the biologic-naïve population (the highest probability of any intervention) and 98.2% in the biologic-experienced population.

CONCLUSIONS:

Secukinumab provides a cost-effective use of NHS resources for patients with active AS who have responded inadequately to either CC or biologic treatment. The availability of a confidential patient access scheme discount for secukinumab in the UK further strengthens the case for cost-effectiveness in these populations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PMS44

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×