COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SACUBITRIL/VALSARTAN COMPARED WITH STANDARD ACEI THERAPIES FOR HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION IN TAIWAN

Author(s)

Fann C1, Chen S2
1Kainan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 2Novartis (Taiwan), Taipei, Taiwan

OBJECTIVES:

Heart failure (HF) is highly prevalent in the elderly people and has been considered as an intractable disease due to poor survival and life quality. Recently, a novel oral therapy, sacubitril/valsartan, has proven its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular (CV) mortality (by 20%) and all-cause mortality (by 16%) compared with enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Taiwan has a universal health insurance program govern by a single payer, National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). Due to stringent cost containment, the economic evaluation for a new drug is crucial for decision-making.

The aim of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis for sacubitril /valsartan compared with 4 types of ACEi for HFrEF patients from a single payer’s perspective.

METHODS:

We adopted a 2-state Markov model developed by McMurray et al. The effectiveness was derived from the PARADIGM-HF trial. Medical utilization and cost data were derived from the NHIA claimed data. Both incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were estimated. The ceiling ratio was set at Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in Taiwan, around $23,000, per life year gained (LYG). A 3.5% discount rate was used for cost and effectiveness with a lifetime follow-up.

RESULTS:

The LYG of 0.6838 results in an ICER of $18,449 for sacubitril /valsartan vs. enalapril. The corresponding ICERs are $17,750, $17,638, $17,774 for ramipril, prindopril, and lisinopril, respectively. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of 0.5646 results in an ICUR of $22,345 for sacubitril /valsartan vs. enalapril. The most influential parameter in univariate sensitivity analysis is the constant term in the statistical model of CV mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Sacubitril/valsartan compared with ACEi for HFrEF patients is cost-effective given on a ceiling ratio of $23,000 per LYG in Taiwan.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PCV93

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×