COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF NOVEL TREATMENTS FOR ADVANCED MELANOMA- A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OUTCOMES
Author(s)
Franken M1, Leeneman B2, Gheorghe M1, Buyukkaramikli N1, Gerrits J2, van der Helm I2, Uyl-De Groot C1, Versteegh M1, Haanen J3, van Baal P2
1Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 3Netherlands Cancer Institute- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of comparative evidence of novel treatments for advanced melanoma. We synthesised effectiveness and safety evidence using a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in Embase, Medline, and Cochrane to retrieve effectiveness and safety evidence of randomised controlled phase-III trials (RCTs; time frame January 1, 2010 to March 1, 2017). Evidence on effectiveness (hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety (relative risk [RR] for a grade ≥III adverse event [AE]) was synthesised by means of a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbarzine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel, and paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin. RESULTS: Out of 1,100 citations, 25 phase-III RCTs were identified. Twenty-one (seventeen) treatments could be included in the effectiveness (safety) NMA. Dabrafenib plus trametinib was identified as most effective treatment, both in terms of HR for PFS (0.21 [95%CrI: 0.17-0.27]) and probability of being the best treatment (PBB: 61% of the simulations). Vemurafenib plus cobimetinib followed as second-best (PBB: 39%; HR PFS: 0.22 [95%CrI: 0.17-0.29]) and dabrafenib as third option (HR PFS: 0.32 [95%CrI: 0.23-0.42]). In case of no BRAF-mutation, nivolumab plus ipilimumab ranked best (PBB: 97%; HR PFS: 0.37 [95%CrI: 0.27-0.49]), followed by nivolumab (HR PFS: 0.50 [95%CrI:0.40-0.62]) and pembrolizumab (HR PFS 3-weekly: 0.51 [95%CrI:0.36-0.71]). Prembolizumab was most favourable regarding safety (RR for AE 2-weekly [3-weekly]: 0.45 [0.59]; 95%CrI:0.25-0.72 [0.35-0.92]; PBB: 87% [11%]). Six treatments ranked better than dacarbazine, ten ranked lower. The four most effective treatments (HR for PFS) ranked lower than dacarbazine regarding safety. CONCLUSIONS: Until new evidence from RCTs becomes available, our study provides valuable insights into each novel treatment’s comparative effectiveness and safety. Dabrafenib plus trametinib seems the most effective treatment for advanced melanoma, closely followed by vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Both treatments have, however, less favourable safety outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland
Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)
Code
PCN8
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Oncology, Sensory System Disorders