ADAPTING THE UNITED STATES’ ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAMME GUIDELINES TO BUILD AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR CHINESE HOSPITALS

Author(s)

Gao X1, Chen Y2, Jiang S1, Lesher B1, Yang F3, Dong P2, Charbonneau C4
1Pharmerit International, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd., Beijing, China, 3Institute of Antibiotics, Shanghai, China, 4Pfizer P.I.O., Paris, France

OBJECTIVES:

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (AmSPs) are widely reported to support appropriate antibiotic use and help control antibiotic resistance. However, the value of AmSPs has not been fully studied and there is a lack of established AmSP value evaluation framework in China. This study aimed to develop a China-specific AmSP evaluation framework by referring to the existing U.S. guidelines and supplementing with the unique characteristics of Chinese AmSPs.

METHODS:

Experts from geographically representative Chinese hospitals were interviewed face-to-face between August-October 2016 using the questionnaire developed based on the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection guidelines. An evaluation model framework adapted to the Chinese healthcare system was developed based on the US guidelines and survey responses.

RESULTS:

The interviewed experts were infectious disease specialists (n=6) or hospital/pharmacy directors (n=3) from 9 tertiary/Grade A hospitals with active AmSPs (average implementing time=3 years) in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu. Most components from the U.S. guidelines were incorporated into the Chinese framework with 3 main categories: resource needs (personnel, equipment), related clinical outcomes (antimicrobial resistant rate, mortality), and health economic impact (length of stay, defined daily dose). Main differences from U.S. include: 1) limited/no pharmacist involvement in routine participation in intravenous-to-oral switch programs, antibiotic dose modifications/discontinuations; 2) inclusion of more economic outcome endpoints of AmSPs (e.g., ICU use, reduced intravenous days due to early switch, hospital onset infection rate, and restricted antimicrobial drugs use); and 3) taking a hospital business case perspective by adding a return-on-investment calculation.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study is the first step to develop a comprehensive AmSP evaluation framework for Chinese hospitals. It will help Chinese hospital decision-makers measure the costs and benefits associated with their specific AmSP and gain a better understanding of their value, thus creating an enhanced engagement in implementing AmSPs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2017-11, ISPOR Europe 2017, Glasgow, Scotland

Value in Health, Vol. 20, No. 9 (October 2017)

Code

PIN105

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Quality of Care Measurement, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×