POTENTIAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NERATINIB FOLLOWING TRASTUZUMAB THERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF EARLY-STAGE HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER

Author(s)

Schwartz NR1, Steuten L2, Babigumira JB1, Roth JA2
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

OBJECTIVES : A recent clinical trial demonstrated that the use of neratinib after trastuzumab therapy significantly improves 24-month disease-free survival (93.9% vs 91.6%; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.19) in women with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. When neratinib was approved by the FDA in July 2017, controversies arose relating to its cost-effectiveness. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the clinical and economic implications of adding neratinib to the clinical pathway for women with HER2-positive breast cancer following treatment with trastuzumab based on results of the pivotal neratinib trial NCT00878709.

METHODS : We created a 3-state Markov model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of up to 2 years of neratinib therapy following trastuzumab vs. a standard monitoring protocol only in cohorts of women with Stage I-III breast cancer. Two-year recurrence rates were based on ExteNET trial results. Rates of recurrence after 2 years and overall survival were drawn from the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. We obtained direct medical expenditure inputs from the peer-reviewed literature. Costs and life-years were tracked over a lifetime horizon and used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We took a payer perspective, considered costs in 2017 USD, and discounted all outcomes at 3% per year.

RESULTS : In the base case, the neratinib and standard care strategies resulted in 19.4 and 18.9 life years and $364,633 and $130,012 total cost. The cost per life year gained was $497,898. A one-way sensitivity analysis revealed the model was most sensitive to variations in the transition probability for progression to death.

CONCLUSIONS : We estimate that giving up to 2 years of neratinib following trastuzumab therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective relative to implied willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States. As follow-up observational data becomes available, future analyses should reassess costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness associated with neratinib treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PCN102

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×