PATIENT AND CLINICIAN SATISFACTION WITH PHARMACOLOGICAL STRESS AGENTS (PSAS) USED IN SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING (SPECT-MPI)

Author(s)

Shields AL1, Hudgens S2, Spalding J3, Kitt TM3, Ojo O1, Kristy RM4, Mathias A1, Morrissey L1, Litcher-Kelly L1, Houle CR3
1Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA, 2Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Tucson, AZ, USA, 3Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA, 4Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed patient and clinician satisfaction with three pharmacological stress agents (PSAs)-- regadenoson (REG), adenosine (ADE) and dipyridamole (DIP)— used in single photon emission computerized tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI), a non-invasive imaging test commonly used for the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease.

METHODS: This multisite, non-interventional, non-randomized study involved patients undergoing PSA-facilitated SPECT-MPI and clinicians administering or assisting in the test. Patients completed two patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires: the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), to assess satisfaction with services provided at the site, and the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PSPQ), to assess satisfaction specifically with the PSA. Clinicians completed one of two clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) questionnaires: the Clinician Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (CSPQ; for physicians) or the modified CSPQ (mCSPQ; for nurses and technologists) to assess satisfaction utilizing a specific PSA. Differences on the PSPQ and PSQ between the PSAs were assessed using analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Differences on the CSPQ and mCSPQ with the PSAs were reported descriptively.

RESULTS: Across 10 sites, 291 patients (n=147, 100, and 44 with REG, ADE and DIP, respectively), and 47 clinicians (physicians n=11; nurses/technologists n=36) participated. Patients receiving REG rated their satisfaction with services experienced at the site (PSQ) more favorably relative to those receiving ADE (p<.05). There were no significant pairwise differences for PSA-related Overall Satisfaction (PSPQ), but patients rated REG more favorably relative to ADE on Satisfaction with Administration (p<.05), and DIP more favorably relative to ADE for Visit Preparation (p<.05). Clinicians reported highest satisfaction for REG on Preparation, Administration, Monitor, Side Effects, and Overall Satisfaction domains of the CSPQ and mCSPQ.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that clinicians and patients have quantifiable differences in satisfaction with PSAs. A cross-over clinical trial would be needed in order to measure actual preference between agents.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PMD80

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×