INCIDENCE OF SUBSEQUENT LUMBAR SURGERY FOLLOWING POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION

Author(s)

Corso KA1, Etter K2, Menzie AM3, Bhattacharyya S3, Pracyk JB4
1Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Raynham, MA, USA, 3DePuy Synthes, Inc., Raynham, MA, USA, 4Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES

A procedural revision is a common event after an index posterior lumbar spinal fusion (PSF). However, there is little evidence on the characterization of any subsequent lumbar surgeries following index PSF. This study evaluates the incidence of and potential influencing factors associated with subsequent surgeries in the lumbar spine (SSLS) following PSF.

METHODS

Patients with ICD-9/10 codes for PSF of 1-2 spinal levels were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database®, 2013-2016. Patients were required to be from hospitals that continuously contributed data to the database for at least one year after index PSF. Patients’ demographics as well as clinical, procedural, hospital, and provider characteristics were collected and analyzed. The incidence of any SSLS within one year after PSF was estimated. Potential factors associated with SSLS were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS CONCLUSIONS

Following PSF of 1-2 levels, most patients returning for SSLS undergo the same procedure as the index surgery. A combination of hospital and patient factors are associated with odds of SSLS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PHP116

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×