DURATION OF TREATMENT AND ECONOMIC BURDEN IN PATIENTS WITH ANAPLASTIC LYMPHOMA KINASE POSITIVE (ALK+) NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) RECEIVING SECOND-LINE ALK INHIBITORS

Author(s)

Lin HM1, Hou P1, Huang H1, Desai A1, Jahanzeb M2
1Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

OBJECTIVES: To describe the real-world treatment patterns and economic burden of patients with ALK+ NSCLC treated with second-line ALK inhibitors. METHODS: This retrospective study used the Optum Research database to identify adult patients with a lung cancer diagnosis code (≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims ≥30 days but ≤1 year apart) and use of a second-line ALK inhibitor (alectinib or ceritinib) after crizotinib, between January 2011 and March 2017. Study outcomes were time to discontinuation of second-line ALK inhibitors and probability of continued use at 6 months. Healthcare costs (2016 USD) were investigated in a subgroup analysis that included patients who had continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits for 6 months prior to second-line ALK inhibitor treatment. RESULTS:

Conference/Value in Health Info

2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)

Code

PCN24

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×