COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF NILOTINIB VERSUS HIGH-DOSE IMATINIB FOR THE SECOND-LINE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA IN CHINA - BASED ON NATION-WIDE DATA
Author(s)
Guan L1, Huang C1, Liu Y2
1Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China, 2China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES The incidence of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in China has increased rapidly. The first-line imatinib (400 mg QD), as the first generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can make CML reach a 10-year overall survival rate of 85-90% and a progression-free-survival rate of 92%. However, some patients caught imatinib-resistance (ImR) or imatinib-intolerance (ImI) in the first-line therapy, who had to begin second-line therapy replacing with nilotinib or high-dose imatinib (600/800 mg QD). Therefore, CML has become a chronic disease, aggravating the burden of both patients and society. This study assessed whether nilotinib or high-dose imatinib for the second-line treatment of ImR/ImI CML Chinese patients is more cost-effective from the perspective of both clinical medical cost and the medical insurance system. METHODS This study presented a cost-effectiveness analysis of nilotinib versus high-dose imatinib for ImR/ImI CML patients in China. The study used a model to simulate disease burden based on overall survival rate and a progression-free-survival rate over a 5-yeat time horizon. Results were presented as an incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS In the second-line treatment of CML patients, nilotinib plan was associated with lower costs (RMB 5.97 million) and improved QALYs (170.7), over 5 years, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of RMB 154,330.8/QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of this study were reliable and stable. At the used threshold of RMB 139,593/QALY, the new policy was cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of ImR/ImI CML Chinese patients by nilotinib plan is more cost-effective based on the used threshold of RMB 154,330.8/QALY. The results implying that nilotinib is an absolute advantage as a second-line treatment for ImR/ImI CML patients, and if it could be included in the China’s medical insurance directory, Chinese medical insurance fund will be greatly saved in the payment for CML treatment.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2018-05, ISPOR 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 21, S1 (May 2018)
Code
PSY53
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Systemic Disorders/Conditions