HEALTHCARE COSTS AND SWITCHING IN PATIENTS INITIATING BIOLOGIC DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS

Author(s)

Nadkarni A1, You M2, Graham JP2
1Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Plainsboro, NJ, USA, 2Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare healthcare costs and switch rates between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating intravenous (IV) abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab.  METHODS:   This study was a retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from US managed care plans. Patients who initiated one of the following study biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: IV abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab were identified and date of initiation was defined as the index date.  The identification period was 7/1/2004 through 3/31/2010. Patients were required to have continuous eligibility in the 6 months pre-index (baseline) period and in the 12 months post-index (follow-up) period, were aged ≥18 years at index, and had ≥1 baseline medical claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for RA (714.0x, 714.2x). Outcomes evaluated in the 12 month follow-up period were total healthcare costs (medical + pharmacy) and switch rates. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to compare mean change from baseline in total healthcare costs between the treatment groups.  Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the odds of switching between treatment groups after controlling for baseline characteristics.  RESULTS: The study included 8505 first-line patients and 2181 second-line patients.  In first-line patients change from baseline in monthly total healthcare costs were higher for etanercept (Cost Ratio (CR)=1.26; p=0.0112), adalimumab (CR=1.30; p=0.0065) and infliximab (CR=1.10; p=0.3355) compared to abatacept.  In the first-line population, after controlling for baseline covariates, etanercept (Odds Ratio (OR)=2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.57, 4.05), adalimumab (OR=2.33, 95% CI:1.44, 3.77) and infliximab (OR=1.91, 95% CI:1.17, 3.13) had significantly higher odds of switching compared to abatacept.  Results for the second-line population were consistent with results from the first line population.  CONCLUSIONS: First or second-line abatacept patients had lowest mean change from baseline in total healthcare costs and lower rates of switching compared to adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PMS19

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×