EXCESS HEALTHCARE COSTS AMONG ELDERLY BREAST CANCER PATIENTS, BY RECEIPT OF HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2-TARGETED THERAPY- AN ANALYSIS OF SEER-MEDICARE DATA

Author(s)

Hao Y1, Lang K2, Huang H2, Lin I2, Rogerio JW1, Menzin J2
1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 2Boston Health Economics, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have examined excess health-care costs among elderly breast cancer (BC) patients by receipt of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HER2-) targeted therapy.  METHODS: Women aged 65+ with an incident diagnosis of BC (index) and no history of other cancer were identified from 2006-2010 linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare data. Women were divided into two cohorts based on receipt of HER2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab or lapatinib) and matched 1:1 to non-cancer comparison cohorts by age, sex, and race.  Continuous enrollment from 1 year pre-index (baseline) through disenrollment, death, or the end of the data was required. All-cause costs were evaluated per-patient-per-month (PPPM) overall and by stage.  Generalized linear models were constructed to identify factors associated with costs, by stage, controlling for demographics and comorbidity. RESULTS: We identified 1,746 BC patients receiving and 35,114 not receiving HER2-targeted therapy. Unadjusted excess total costs (vs. non-cancer patients) were $4,079 PPPM for the HER2-targeted cohort and $990 for the no HER2-targeted cohort (both P < 0.001), with larger differences at more advanced stages.  Excess cost drivers were outpatient care and physician/provider services (including HER2-targeted therapy acquisition and administration costs).  In multivariate analyses, Stage I HER2-targeted BC patients experienced 3.17 times greater total costs than non-cancer patients; while those with Stages II, III, and IV had 3.02, 3.40, and 4.27 times greater costs respectively (all P < 0.001). Similar trends with generally smaller magnitudes were observed among patients without HER2-targeted therapy (0.48 [I]; 0.83 [II]; 1.67 [III]; 4.33 [IV]; all P < 0.001). Other significant cost predictors included older age, Black or Hispanic race, and baseline Charlson score>2. CONCLUSIONS: Women with BC experience higher costs than non-cancer patients, with greater burden among those receiving HER2-targeted therapy.  Excess cost drivers were outpatient care and physician/provider services.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PCN56

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×