COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF NOVEL DMARDS AS MONOTHERAPY AND IN COMBINATION WITH METHOTREXATE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH AN INADEQUATE RESPONSE TO TRADITIONAL DMARDS – A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Buckley F1, Best JH2, Dejonckheere F3, Finckh A4, Huizinga T5, Jansen JP6
1Mapi, Boston, MA, USA, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, 4University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 5Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, 6Redwood Outcomes, San Francisco, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: To compare ACR responses between novel DMARDs, either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX), including subcutaneous (SC) abatacept and SC tocilizumab (TCZ), in RA patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs (DMARD-IR). METHODS: A systematic literature review identified 30 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated abatacept (intravenous [IV] and SC), anakinra, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, and TCZ (IV and SC). Reported treatment effects--ACR responses at 24 weeks--were synthesized by means of Bayesian network meta-analyses to compare the different treatments as monotherapy and combination therapy. The effects of anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) therapy were assumed to be interchangeable. aTNF data were pooled. RESULTS: The combination therapies aTNFs + MTX, tofacitinib + MTX, abatacept IV/SC + MTX, and TCZ IV/SC + MTX demonstrated comparable ACR responses while anakinra + MTX was less efficacious. Among biologic monotherapies, greater ACR20/50/70 responses were observed with TCZ IV than with aTNFs and tofacitinib. When comparing biologics + MTX with biologic monotherapies, ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses with TCZ + MTX were similar to TCZ as monotherapy (OR=1.04, 95% CI, 0.39-2.80; OR=1.28, 95% CI, 0.46-3.51; OR=0.97, 95% CI, 0.38-2.49, respectively). Greater ACR20/50/70 responses were observed with aTNF + MTX than with aTNF monotherapy (OR=2.22; 95% CI, 0.46-10.83, probability better=84%; OR=3.12, 95% CI, 0.60-16.32, probability better=92%; OR=1.39, 95% CI, 0.26-6.78, probability better=68%, respectively). Sensitivity analyses showed conflicting results for the indirect comparison of tofacitinib + MTX versus tofacitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that most of the novel DMARDs, in combination with MTX, have similar levels of efficacy in DMARD-IR patients. As monotherapy, TCZ is likely to have a greater response than aTNFs and tofacitinib. TCZ monotherapy also shows comparable efficacy compared to TCZ + MTX, whereas aTNFs in combination with MTX showed greater ACR responses compared with aTNF monotherapy at 24 weeks.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2014-05, ISPOR 2014, Palais des Congres de Montreal

Value in Health, Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 2014)

Code

PMS5

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×