WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT DECISION-MAKING CRITERIA FOR INNOVATIVE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION? A NATIONAL SURVEY FROM FRENCH HOSPITALS DECISION-MAKERS

Author(s)

Piazza L1, Balayssac D2, Bertaux A3, Deniès F4, Dutheil J5, Dutot C6, Huot L7, Martelli N8, Oliveri V9, Poder T10, Hayes N1
1Bordeaux University Hospital, Talence, France, 2Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 3Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France, 4Lille University Hospital, Lille, France, 5Caen University Hospital, Caen, France, 6Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France, 7Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France, 8European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France, 9Nice University Hospital, Nice, France, 10CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: In a context of budgetary constraints, the need for hospitals to deliver innovative care improving patient outcomes requires to make informed decisions for innovation integration. In France, hospital-based HTA is not widely spread: only few centers undertake formalized assessment and the decision-making criteria are not well defined. This research aimed at determining a set of relevant criteria for decision-makers, to assess their satisfaction and identify potential obstacles in the decision-making process. METHODS:  A multidisciplinary group from 10 university hospitals designed a survey. A list of criteria was extracted from literature and revised after a beta-test with 7 decision-makers, leading to 47 criteria. Between October 2015 and February 2016, an electronic survey was sent to decision-makers asking them to assess the importance of each criterion on a 5-level Likert scale (from “Useless” to “Essential”). The analysis focused on the percentage of the two best ratings (“Important” and “Essential”) for each criterion. Decision-makers satisfaction was collected on a 4-level scale (from “Unsatisfied” to ”Very satisfied”). Limits could be expressed through open response.  RESULTS:  Preliminary results from 42 decision-makers in 24 French hospitals show that 11 criteria were ranked as “Important” or “Essential” by at least 74% (on average 87%) of respondents: clinical benefit, running costs, quality of clinical evidence, budgetary impact, investment costs, safety, appropriate human resources, compliance with strategic lines, efficiency, structural impact and number of patients. At least 36% (on average 51%) of respondents ranked those criteria as “Essential”. Only 20% of decision-makers were very satisfied with the decision-making process in their hospital. Significant obstacles were identified in four domains: innovation management, innovation assessment, decision-making and innovation funding. CONCLUSIONS:  We determined 11 decision-making criteria which gathered large consensus and could be used in each hospital to design a multi-criteria tool aiming at improving decision-making process in French hospitals.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PHP281

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes

Disease

Multiple Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×