THE IMPACT OF TREATMENT ADHERENCE ON CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS- REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE FROM ALBERTA, CANADA
Author(s)
Gerber B1, Cowling T1, Chen G2, Rivest D3, Yeung MM2, Duquette P4, Kindundu C5, Barbeau M5, Haddad P5
1Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Hôtel-Dieu Lévis, Lévis, QC, Canada, 4Notre Dame Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, 5Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Dorval, QC, Canada
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 1 in 400 Albertans has multiple sclerosis (MS). The study’s objective was to determine the real-world impact of adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on healthcare utilization and costs among MS patients utilizing administrative data from the Alberta health system in Canada. METHODS: MS patients were identified using a validated case definition (≥1 inpatient record or ≥5 practitioner claims within 2 years) and the study index DMT was defined as the first claim for a DMT between 1April2011 to 31March2014. Treatment adherence (medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80%), healthcare utilization (including ambulatory care visits, physician claims and hospitalizations) and healthcare costs were explored using multivariable negative binominal regression and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 2864 MS patients, 73.8% were female and 61.7% were aged 35-55 years old. Common comorbidities included depression (31%), anxiety (18%), and hypertension (10%). Overall, 66% of the sample were adherent (MPR≥80%). Compared to non-adherent patients, adherent patients had fewer ambulatory care visits (All-cause: 8.8 vs 10.9, p=0.0012; MS-related: 4.3 vs 5.3; p=0.001), physician visits (All-cause: 15.1 vs 18.2, p=0.0001; MS-related: 3.6 vs 4.4; p=0.0001), and hospitalizations (All-cause: 5.2% vs 10.2%, p<0.0001; MS-related: 1.2% vs 2.5%, p=0.0088). After adjusting for potential confounding factors adherent patients had approximately 20% less physician visits (MS-related: IRR 0.82 (0.79,0.86), p<0.0001; All-cause: IRR 0.83 (0.81,0.85), p<0.0001) and ambulatory care visits (MS-related IRR 0.80 (0.77,0.84), p<0.0001; All-cause: IRR 0.82 (0.80,0.84), p<0.0001) and approximately 50% fewer hospitalizations (MS-related: OR 0.50 (0.28-0.89), p<0.0001; All-Cause: OR 0.48 (0.35-0.64), p<0.0001) than non-adherent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing the impact of adherence on healthcare resource utilization in MS in Canada are limited. Among MS patients in this Canadian study, non-adherence was associated with increased health system utilization. An understanding of the importance of the impact of adherence on healthcare utilization may lead to more informed decision-making.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)
Code
PND68
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Real World Data & Information Systems, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Health & Insurance Records Systems, Health Care Research, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Prescribing Behavior, Registries, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Neurological Disorders
Explore Related HEOR by Topic