ROSUVASTATIN- SWITCHING TREATMENT AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS IN PRIMARY CARE

Author(s)

Heiman F1, Ripellino C2, Colivicchi F3
1IMS Health Information Solutions Italy S.r.l., Milan, Italy, 2IMS Health, Milan, Italy, 3Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero “S. Filippo Neri”, Rome, Italy

OBJECTIVES: to assess the impact of switching from Rosuvastatin to any other lipid lowering therapy on clinical outcomes in primary care. METHODS: a retrospective analysis based on data extracted from IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database (IMS Health LPD). All new patients being treated with rosuvastatin (10-20 mg) between 1st January 2011 and 31th December 2013 were included in the analysis and the date of the first prescription was defined as the Index Date (ID). Exclusion criteria were the occurrence of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the six months before the ID and the presence of at least one prescription of another statine in addition to rosuvastatin at the ID. Starting from the ID, patients were followed up until September 2015 or until one of the following event occurred first: statin treatment discontinuation, occurrence of an AMI or death. RESULTS: The final cohort was composed of 10,368 new patients being treated with rosuvastatin from 2011 to 2013. During the period of observation, 2,452 (23,6%) patients switched from rosuvastatin to another lipid lowering treatment, particularly to atorvastatin (56%) and simvastatin (25%). Factors associated with a higher probability of switch were female gender (HR=1.10, 95% CI:1.02-1.19, p=0.04) and the presence of Chronic Kidney Disease (HR=1.47, 95% CI:1.16-1.86, p=0.05). AMI occurred in 87 patients treated with rosuvastatin (incidence of 6.7 AMI/1000 PY), and in 26 patients switched to another lipid lowering treatment (incidence of 8.3 AMI/1000 PY). Cox proportional hazards model, including switching as a time-dependent covariate, showed that changing from rosuvastatin to another lipid lowering therapy was an independent predictor of AMI (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4–3.5, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from rosuvastatin to another lipid lowering treatment may impart an increased risk of experiencing an AMI and should be avoided unless strictly necessary on clinical grounds.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCV3

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×