MANAGEMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS- A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO IDENTIFY TREATMENT LINES

Author(s)

Phelip J1, Porte F2, Setton M3, Le Lay K3, Le Calvez K2, Bénard S2
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France, 2st[è]ve consultants, Oullins, France, 3Boehringer Ingelheim France, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES:  Data on healthcare management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are scarce in France. A study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of identifying treatment lines in mCRC at patient level using the French hospital DRG base payment system. METHODS:  This system provides data related to hospitalized patient characteristics, clinical diagnoses and medical procedures. Data on expensive therapies registered on the ex-T2A list and charged in addition to DRG tariffs are also available. A step-by-step approach was implemented with experts to establish an algorithm describing treatment pathways and was applied to patients with a first hospitalization for mCRC (ICD-10 codes: C18-C20 and C77-C79) in 2011 and followed during a 4-year period. RESULTS:  21,003 patients were identified in 2011, 65.7% received chemotherapy, and 52.8% of them at least one targeted therapy (47.2% receiving anti-EGFR therapy and 52.7% bevacizumab without anti-EGFR therapy). Patients with at least one targeted therapy were younger than patients receiving a chemotherapy (mean age of 61.6 vs. 66.1 years). The mean number of hospital stays was higher for patients receiving a targeted therapy (40 vs. 20, respectively). Due to lack of details on clinical data and on chemotherapy administration, we were not able to identify treatment lines. Others sources were then explored, e.g. the French national representative claims databases (EGB/SNIIRAM), which do not permit to overcome these limitations. CONCLUSIONS:  Even if characteristics of patients, their disease and some drugs administrations (the most expensive ones) can be described accurately, current French databases do not allow to adequately identify complete mCRC treatment lines. There is a need to adapt current tools to collect additional data. Indeed, with new coming therapies, more precise epidemiological, clinical and economic information would be helpful for decision makers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN266

Topic

Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Hospital and Clinical Practices

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×