BUDGET IMPACT OF APREMILAST FOR ACTIVE PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN THE UK
Author(s)
Mughal F1, Damera V2, Gagnon J2
1Celgene Ltd, Uxbridge, UK, 2Mapi Group, London, UK
Presentation Documents
A 5-year budget impact model was developed for the UK; the target population was based on the total population, annual population growth rate, and prevalence of PsA. The total PsA population was divided into 3 categories: untreated patients, patients receiving conventional DMARD therapy, and patients treated with biologics. The analyses included all relevant biologic therapies (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab). Biosimilars for etanercept and infliximab were also included in the model. Drug costs were quoted from the British National Formulary (BNF) and the Monthly Index of Medical Specialties (MIMS). Administration costs, physician visit, and laboratory test costs were informed by National Health Service (NHS) reference costs and literature values. RESULTS:
Over a 5-year period, the number of patients treated with apremilast was estimated to increase from 15 to 1,573. The addition of apremilast to the treatment regimen decreased the total budget by 1.1% (£819,067,731 vs. £828,163,620) relative to a treatment regimen without apremilast. In the final year, drug acquisition costs decreased by 3.34% (£111,988,544 vs. £115,860,612), and administration and monitoring costs decreased by 0.69% (£51,901,617 vs. £52,262,395), yielding a net cost savings of 2.52%. CONCLUSIONS:
Inclusion of apremilast in the PsA treatment regimen in the UK was cost-saving in all respects.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)
Code
PMS14
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis
Disease
Musculoskeletal Disorders