ASSESSMENT OF DECISIONS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA CONSIDERED BY SEVEN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AGENCIES

Author(s)

Puig-Peiró R1, Planellas L2, Gilabert Perramon A1, Roset M2, Barrull C2, Prat A1, Solozabal M2
1Catalan Health Service (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain, 2IMS Health, Barcelona, Spain

OBJECTIVES:  In the context of gradual implementation of economic evaluation of medicines, the Catalan Health Service (CatSalut) aimed to review decisions made and cost-effectiveness criteria considered by seven Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies for a sample of 49 oncologic indications. METHODS:  Included agencies were HAS (France), IQWIG (Germany), NICE (United Kingdom), PBAC (Australia), pCODR (Canada), SMC (Scotland) and TLV (Sweden). Reports available online on agencies’ websites covering the target indications until October 2015 were reviewed in order to extract information on decisions made and criteria considered. For those reports including an EE, relationship between the type of recommendation and the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed. RESULTS:  Overall,

Conference/Value in Health Info

2016-10, ISPOR Europe 2016, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Vol. 19, No. 7 (November 2016)

Code

PCN240

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Health Disparities & Equity, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×