PHASE IB STUDY OF PATIENTS RECEIVING TOPOTECAN BY CONVECTION-ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) FOR RECURRENT MALIGNANT GLIOMAS- NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTIONING AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES

Author(s)

Oberg JA*;Dave A;Bruce JN, Sands SA Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Malignant gliomas are highly proliferative, invasive tumors that are resistant to conventional treatment and are typically accompanied by progressive physical and mental debilitation. We evaluated neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and quality of life (QOL) as part of a prospective Phase Ib dose-escalation study of topotecan by CED in patients with recurrent gliomas. METHODS: Secondary data analysis was conducted on the 16 patients enrolled on the Phase Ib study. Independent-sample t-tests were used to explore differences. Patients received serial assessments at baseline, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-months post-treatment. NCF and QOL were assessed using the HeadMinder Cognitive Stability Index and the SF-36, respectively.  RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (68.7%) with a median age of 50 years (Range=22-71 years).  Tumor volume and total infused dose of topotecan were not associated with any of the outcome variables. NCF was better for early responders (ERs) than patients with progressive disease (PD) or pseudoprogression (PP). Processing speed for ERs (n=4) averaged over the follow-up period was significantly higher (z=1.95 SD) than patients with PD (n=5; z=-0.61 SD) (p=0.006).  Similarly, change in response time was better for ERs compared to those with PD (z=4.40 SD; z=-0.52, respectively; p=0.04).  At baseline, SF-36 results for physical and mental QOL were within normal limits.  Relative to baseline, average change in SF-36 scores post-treatment suggest that overall mental QOL was significantly higher for ERs (MCS change score=5.04) than patients with PD (MCS change score=-6.48) (p=0.02), reflecting better emotional well-being. Average change in physical QOL was not significantly different between ERs, PD or PP. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the beginning framework to better understand NCF/QOL outcomes in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas treated with topotecan by CED.  Continued monitoring of these outcomes will be important in the phase II trial to assess treatment efficacy and impact on NCF and QOL.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PCN115

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×