EFFECTIVENESS AND COST PER RESPONDER WITH FIRST-LINE BIOLOGICS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS USING A VALIDATED, CLAIMS-BASED ALGORITHM IN A LARGE US COMMERCIAL HEALTH PLAN

Author(s)

Curtis J1;Chastek B2;Becker L2;Quach C3;Harrison DJ*4;Yun H1;Joseph G4, Collier D5 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA, 2OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 4Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 5Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: A recently published claims-based algorithm to evaluate effectiveness of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was validated using data from the Veteran Health Administration and VA RA registry. The objective was to compare 1-year cost per responder among biologics approved for first-line treatment of moderate to severe RA, etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, and abatacept among patients in a US health plan using this claims-based algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used commercial claims data from the Optum Research Database, including medical and pharmacy claims for >13.3 million individuals.  Adult patients with RA (ICD-9 714.0x) newly initiating biologic treatment between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 1, 2010 followed by ≥12 months of continuous enrollment were included. Patients with other diagnoses for which these agents are approved were excluded. The algorithm classifies a drug as “non-effective” if any of the following criteria are met: low adherence MPR < 80% or receiving less than the expected number of infusions/injections; increase in biologic dose or frequency; switching biologics; adding new non-biologic Diseases Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs; new glucocorticoid use or increase in glucocorticoid dose; and > 1 parenteral or intra-articular glucocorticoid injection. Drug costs were estimated using actual medication usage and administration costs. Non-responders were defined as patients in whom the drug was classified as “non-effective”. RESULTS: A total of 5,474 patients (2,425 etanercept, 1,857 adalimumab, 773 infliximab, 295 abatacept, and 124 golimumab) were included. Across agents, between 76% and 85% were female, with a mean age of 48 years. The medications were classified “effective” (low disease activity or remission) in 32.7%, 27.7%, 19.0%, 30.2%, and 32.3% of patients respectively. Mean cost per responder was lowest for etanercept ($43,935), followed by golimumab ($49,589), adalimumab ($52,752), abatacept ($62,300), and infliximab ($101,402). CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept had the lowest cost per responder in RA using a new, validated claims based algorithm.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PMS32

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×