COST ANALYSIS OF PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC VITREOMACULAR ADHESION- A BOTTOM-UP COSTING PERSPECTIVE
Author(s)
Nicod E*1;Jackson T2;Grimaccia F1;Angelis A1, Kanavos P1 1London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom, 2King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Presentation Documents
The direct cost to the NHS of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is unknown since a bottom-up costing exercise has not been undertaken. Healthcare resource group (HRG) costing relies on a top-down approach. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the direct cost of PPV for vitreomacular traction (VMT), epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH). METHODS: Each of five NHS vitreoretinal units recorded the indication for surgery and all procedure elements for a minimum of 30 consecutive PPVs, to include at least 10 cases of VMT, ERM, or MH. In-surgery bottom-up costing was undertaken by prospectively recording all consumables, equipment and staff salaries associated with surgery, between March and September 2012. Out-of-surgery costs, namely before and after surgery between admission and discharge, were estimated based on accounting costs recorded in one site. RESULTS: Of 151 PPVs, 57 were for MH (16.6%), ERM (15.2%), or VMT (4%). The average surgical time was 1.22 hours [range 0.96-1.38], corresponding to an average staff cost of £280.40 [£184.90-£376.70]. The average cost of consumables was £534.60 [£406.55-£688.85], and of equipment £87.75 [£28.10-£139.15]. The average direct cost of PPV in theatre was £901.10 [£671.00-£1185.55]. Average out-of-surgery costs were estimated at £325.35, including nursing staff, extra consumables and hospitalisation costs. This resulted in a total cost of £1673.80 [£1496.40-£1863.30], including 30% overheads. This cost estimate is considered an under-estimate because of lack of available data on departmental-level general costs, medical and anaesthetic staff costs incurred out-of-surgery. The average effective HRG tariff reimbursed was £1701.20. CONCLUSIONS: These figures indicate that the real cost incurred is likely to be higher than the reimbursed tariff, but it may be cost-effective for NHS hospitals to undertake additional PPVs for VMT, ERM and MH, if they can amortise existing infrastructure with a sufficient number of interventions to benefit from economies of scale.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)
Code
PSS6
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Sensory System Disorders