CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC EVIDENCE THRESHOLDS FOR ORPHAN DRUGS- ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR FAVORABLE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT ON THE RISE?

Author(s)

Shih AY*1;Duong A1;Tao C2;Ransom JF1;Spinner DS3;White C2;Doyle JJ4, Faulkner EC3 1Quintiles Consulting, Hawthorne, NY, USA, 2Quintiles Consulting, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3Quintiles Consulting, Durham, NC, USA, 4Quintiles, Hawthorne, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: Orphan drugs are therapies for low prevalence or neglected diseases with high unmet need. Many drugs have received orphan status globally, and benefited from 5-10 year marketing exclusivity; reduced stakeholder evidence requirements with unmet need weighing heavily into health technology assessment (HTA) and reimbursement decision-making; and largely uncontested pricing. Given tightening health system budgets, the proliferation of high priced orphan drugs in the United States (US) and Europe (EU) have caused these therapies to come under increased scrutiny from HTA agencies and payers to demonstrate value. To gain insight into evolving market access requirements, we conducted a multimarket review of orphan drug HTAs and reimbursement decisions comparing them to top selling non-orphan drugs in the US and EU. METHODS: Global HTAs and coverage decisions for orphan and blockbuster drugs were characterized and compared based on health economic, clinical and other value-based requirements. An analysis of orphan drug pricing was also conducted where pricing was available.  RESULTS: More than 20 orphan drug HTAs were identified, including those for genetic and central nervous system disorders, cancer and cardiovascular disease. HTA agencies and payers scrutinized the robustness of clinical evidence and lack of comparator data. Cost-effectiveness was also often evaluated, though with relaxed ICER thresholds compared to non-orphan drugs. Failure of an orphan drug to meet historically accepted evidentiary thresholds have led some evaluators to grant conditional reimbursement, with the proviso that further supportive evidence must be provided, although outright reimbursement denial has become increasingly common.  CONCLUSIONS: Once considered “reimbursement-safe” for drug developers, to achieve unrestricted reimbursement from payers orphan drugs now face higher evidentiary hurdles that are increasingly similar to non-orphan drugs. New pharmaceuticals intent on achieving optimal market access as an orphan drug must factor the evolving requirements for demonstrating value into clinical and health economic evidence generation plans.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PND44

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Multiple Diseases, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×