CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF USING FONDAPARINUX OR ENOXAPARIN FOR THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN HIP SURGERY IN BRAZIL

Author(s)

Milani Jr R1;Barbosa EG2;Penha M2, Machado M*2 1Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2GlaxoSmithKline Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant impact on morbidity/mortality and economic burden to health systems. For preventing VTE in hip fracture/arthroplasty, the American College of Chest Physicians Practice Guidelines recommends the use of antithrombotic agents, such as fondaparinux and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). We present a cost-effectiveness analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE in hip surgery in Brazil. METHODS: A decision model was developed with a 180-day post-surgery horizon for the comparison of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin, both administered during hospitalization (average eight days) for the prophylaxis of VTE in hip surgery. Thromboembolic event and major bleeding probabilities were derived from three major published randomized clinical trials comparing fondaparinux and enoxaparin (N>6,000). Costs were calculated using microcosting technique in search for hip surgery and thrombotic/hemorrhagic complications reimbursed from the public Brazilian Unified Health System Database (DATASUS) in June 2012. Drug prices for antithrombotic prophylaxis were extracted from the Health Prices Database (BPS) in 2012 (1BRZ=0.52USD). RESULTS: VTE was observed in 5.9% versus 11.5% of patients with fondaparinux and enoxaparin, respectively (relative risk reduction = 48.8%). Major bleeding (leading to death, reoperation or in critical sites) were similar in both groups, although bleeding with index >2 were more frequent in fondaparinux (2.4% versus 1.7%). Cost-effectiveness data showed fondaparinux was dominant over enoxaparin (i.e., reduced mortality at lower costs). There was an increment of three deaths per 1,000 patients by using enoxaparin instead of fondaparinux. Fondaparinux reported cost savings of BRZ16.53 per patient treated. Influence analysis showed that the incremental deaths and costs of enoxaparin were largely related to the higher incidence of thrombotic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Fondaparinux was found to be a cost-effective option under the Brazilian Public Health System perspective for the prophylaxis of VTE, resulting in lower mortality incidence at a reduced budget impact.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2013-05, ISPOR 2013, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Vol. 16, No. 3 (May 2013)

Code

PCV92

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×