USE OF SIMULATION TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF A REMOTE MONITORING SYSTEM

Author(s)

Laplante S1, McLeod K2, Danek JA1, Kudelka TL1, Sloand JA1, Gellens ME1
1Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA, 2Xcenda LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA

OBJECTIVES: Remote monitoring (RM) is useful in chronic diseases, but evidence is scarce in home dialysis. Sharesource™, a two way connectivity platform with RM capabilities, should enable earlier intervention and healthcare savings. This abstract describes a simulation study designed to estimate the type and importance of the savings. METHODS:  This study used an approach similar (although in a virtual environment) to that for diagnostic tests, i.e., additional information impact on treatment pathways. Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patient profiles (e.g., therapy non-compliance, fluid overload, etc.) were developed by a group of in-house nephrologists and nurses experienced in managing APD patients. Each patient profile was developed in 2 scenarios: “with RM” information (treatment data, blood pressure, weight) and “without RM”. Nephrologist (US=4, Germany=3, Italy=2) experts in managing APD patients validated the “without RM” resources. The “with RM” resources were evaluated by 15 (US=7, Germany=4, Italy=4) APD teams (1 nephrologist & 1 nurse). Resources were compared with t-tests. RESULTS: Patient profile development required several rounds of individual and group reviews over a 6 month-period to ensure clarity of clinical event sequence and clinician management response. During the process, 8 profiles were abandoned, leaving 12 profiles for the simulation. Recruitment of experts and APD teams was moderately easy, the biggest hurdle was contract signature in some countries (e.g., Italy). Participants submitted responses, usually within two weeks. Overall, results indicate that RM could avoid 49-75 healthcare resources (4.1-6.2 per patient profile), including clinic calls/visits (48-72), but also hospitalizations (2), emergency room visits (3.5-5) and transfer from APD to in-center hemodialysis (1-2.25). These patient profiles were perceived as representative of 17-37% of the APD patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This simulation was a rapid and affordable way of estimating the type and importance of potential reductions in healthcare resource consumption to be expected from RM in APD patients while waiting for real-world evidence.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2015-11, ISPOR Europe 2015, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Vol. 18, No. 7 (November 2015)

Code

PRM240

Topic

Study Approaches

Disease

Urinary/Kidney Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×